Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 1;22(6):e796-e799.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.22082.

Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty

A-A Al-Samman  1
Affiliations

Evaluation of Kharma scale as a predictor of lower third molar extraction difficulty

A-A Al-Samman. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Background: The Evaluation of the degree of lower third molar (L3M) extraction difficulty is extremely important for both clinicians and patients. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of a new index (Kharma scale) as a preoperative predictor index of the difficulty of surgical removal of impacted L3M.

Material and methods: Extraction difficulty of a series of 49-impacted L3M was predicted preoperatively by Kharma scale, and postoperative difficulty was assessed with a modified Parant scale.

Results: The sensitivity of Kharma scale, as a predictor of difficulty, was 18.2% and the specificity was 68.4%. Likelihood ratios for the Kharma categories also indicated that the scale is of little value for predicting a difficult extraction. There was no significant association between the Kharma score and duration of operation, but high-modified Parant scores were significantly associated with longer operations.

Conclusions: The proposed Kharma scale was unreliable as preoperative predictor of the L3M extraction difficulty, and both radiological and clinical information must be taken into account.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement:The author declare that there is no conflict of interest related to this study.

References

    1. Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Mendez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Somoza-Martin JM, Gándara-Rey JM, and García-García A. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:23–6. - PubMed
    1. Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofa Surg. 2007;65:1977–83. - PubMed
    1. Yuasa H, Kawai T, Sugiura M. Classification of surgical difficulty in extracting impacted third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40:26–31. - PubMed
    1. García-García A, Sampedro FG, Rey JG, Vila PG, Martin MS. Pell-Gregory classification is unreliable as a predictor of difficulty in extracting impacted lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;83:585–7. - PubMed
    1. Santosh P. Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: Review of literature and a proposal of a combined clinical and radiological classification. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015;5:229–34. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources