Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 16;9(8):e1571.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.1571.

A Low-Cost, Low-Skill Model for Efficient Breast Cancer Screening in Low Resource Rural Settings of a Developing Country

Affiliations

A Low-Cost, Low-Skill Model for Efficient Breast Cancer Screening in Low Resource Rural Settings of a Developing Country

Sachin Khanduri et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objective To suggest a low-cost, easily-operable, non-invasive imaging modality for cancer detection in rural settings. Method A total of 212 cases with palpable breast masses aged 18 - 65 years were enrolled and underwent thorough clinical, mammographic, and ultrasonographic (USG) evaluation. Imaging findings were reported using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS®) criteria. The findings were confirmed histopathologically. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test. Results The malignancy rate was 35.8% (n = 76). On mammography, lesions size, margins, shape, calcification, and distorted arch/skin thickening were significantly associated with malignancy. On USG, the number of nodules, shape, margins, echotexture, posterior wall echo, through transmission changes, distorted arch/skin thickening, microlobulation, duct extension, and height/width ratio were significantly associated with malignancy. Independently, mammography and USG had a sensitivity of 78.1% and 80.3%, respectively, and a specificity of 83.3% and 89.0%, respectively. Using a positive result of either study as the criteria, the sensitivity was 97.4% and the specificity was 80.1%. Conclusion The combined use of mammography and USG provides high sensitivity and specificity, thus showing that a combination of two can be used as a screening tool for use in low resource rural settings.

Keywords: breast cancer; low resource rural settings; mammography; usg.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A 44-year-old female patient with intraductal carcinoma variant
A) Mammographic craniocaudal and B) mediolateral oblique views of the left breast show a high-density mass in inferomedial quadrant (white arrow), along with ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy (black arrow). C) High-resolution ultrasonography image of the left breast shows a heterogeneously hyperechoic mass with anechoic component with fine internal echoes at 5 o'clock position. D) Photomicrograph of this section shows glands in cribriform pattern lined by atypical pleomorphic cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and high nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio (hematoxylin and eosin stain 10X).
Figure 2
Figure 2. A 35-year-old female patient of phyllodes tumor
A) Mammographic craniocaudal and B) mediolateral oblique views of left breast shows a large, lobulated high density mass occupying the entire upper quadrant (white arrow). C) High-resolution ultrasonography image of left breast shows a large, lobulated heterogeneously hypoechoic mass occupying the entire right breast extending from 8 o'clock to 4 o'clock position (red arrow). D) Photomicrograph of this section shows marked stromal proliferation with stroma bulging into the glandular lining forming a leaf like architecture (hematoxylin and eosin 4X).

Similar articles

References

    1. Current approaches and challenges in early detection of breast cancer recurrence. Schneble EJ, Graham LJ, Shupe MP, et al. J Cancer. 2014;5:281–290. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandramouli C. Registrar. New Delhi: [Jul;2017 ]. 2011. Census of India 2011. Rural Urban Distribution of Population (Provisional Population Totals)
    1. Breast cancer screening existence in India: A non-existing reality. Singh S, Shrivastava JP, Dwivedi A. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015;36:207–209. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rural urban differences in breast cancer in India. Nagrani RT, Budukh A, Koyande S, et al. Indian J Cancer. 2014;51:277–281. - PubMed
    1. Barriers for early detection of cancer amongst Indian rural women. Tripathi N, Kadam YR, Dhobale RV, Gore AD. South Asian J Cancer. 2014;3:122–127. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources