Impact of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines on Case Selection and Outcomes for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma
- PMID: 29059142
- DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001369
Impact of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines on Case Selection and Outcomes for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma
Abstract
Background: In 2010, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommended sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for thin melanomas ≤1 mm with mitotic rate (MR) ≥1. In 2016, the criteria were changed to Breslow depth >0.75 mm and MR ≥1.
Objective: To compare the impact of 2010 and 2016 NCCN guidelines on SLNB case selection and thin melanoma outcomes.
Materials and methods: Ten-year retrospective cohort of primary thin melanomas at an academic hospital was retroactively stratified for SLNB eligibility using the 2010 and 2016 NCCN guidelines. Nodal recurrence-free survival (NRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared.
Results: Eight hundred two patients with 859 tumors and median follow-up of 79 months were included. Eleven percent fewer tumors qualified for SLNB under 2016 versus 2010 NCCN guidelines (19% vs 8%, p < .001). The 2016-qualifying cases also had lower 10-year NRFS (70.7% vs 95.2%, p < .001) and DFS (64.7% vs 91.4%, p < .001). Among 2016-qualifying cases, those that received SLNB had improved NRFS (85.6% vs 35.3%, p = .001) and DFS (80.2% vs 30.5%, p < .001) as compared to those that did not receive SLNB.
Conclusion: The 2016 NCCN guidelines reduced the number of thin melanomas qualifying for SLNB and more accurately selected cases with higher risks of nodal recurrence and death.
Comment in
-
Commentary on Impact of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines on Case Selection and Outcomes for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma.Dermatol Surg. 2018 Apr;44(4):502-503. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001438. Dermatol Surg. 2018. PMID: 29309343 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Commentary on Impact of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines on Case Selection and Outcomes for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma.Dermatol Surg. 2019 May;45(5):737-738. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001660. Dermatol Surg. 2019. PMID: 30199434 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Suboptimal Compliance With National Comprehensive Cancer Network Melanoma Guidelines: Who Is at Risk?Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;41(8):754-759. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000362. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018. PMID: 28121641
-
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in thick malignant melanoma: a 10-year single unit experience.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Oct;65(10):1396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.019. Epub 2012 May 1. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012. PMID: 22552263
-
Compliance with sentinel lymph node biopsy guidelines for invasive melanomas treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.Cancer. 2021 Oct 1;127(19):3591-3598. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33651. Epub 2021 Jul 22. Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34292585
-
Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: indications and rationale.Cancer Control. 2009 Jul;16(3):234-9. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600305. Cancer Control. 2009. PMID: 19556963 Review.
-
Sentinel node biopsy should be offered in thin melanoma with mitotic rate greater than one.Dermatol Surg. 2011 Aug;37(8):1080-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02015.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2. Dermatol Surg. 2011. PMID: 21635622 Review.
Cited by
-
Lymphedema secondary to melanoma treatments: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatments.Glob Health Med. 2020 Aug 31;2(4):227-234. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01022. Glob Health Med. 2020. PMID: 33330812 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive Values of Pathological and Clinical Risk Factors for Positivity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 27;12:817510. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817510. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35155254 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical