Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Mar;107(3):414-424.
doi: 10.1111/apa.14128. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

Neonatal Eating Outcome Assessment: tool development and inter-rater reliability

Roberta Pineda  1   2 , Rachel Harris  1 , Felicia Foci  1 , Jessica Roussin  1 , Michael Wallendorf  3
Affiliations
Review

Neonatal Eating Outcome Assessment: tool development and inter-rater reliability

Roberta Pineda et al. Acta Paediatr. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Aim: To define the process of tool development and revision for the Neonatal Eating Outcome (NEO) Assessment and to report preliminary inter-rater reliability.

Methods: Tool development consisted of a review of the literature and observations of feeding performance among 178 preterm infants born ≤32 weeks gestation. 11 neonatal therapy feeding experts provided structured feedback to establish content validity and define the scoring matrix. The tool was then used to evaluate feeding in 50 preterm infants born ≤32 weeks of gestation and 50 full-term infants. Multiple revisions occurred at each stage of development. Finally, six neonatal occupational therapists participated in reliability testing by independently scoring five videos of oral feeding of preterm infants using version 4 of the tool.

Results: The intraclass correlation for the 'prefeeding' score was 0.71 (0.37-0.96), and the intraclass correlation for the 'total' score was 0.83 (0.56-0.98).

Conclusion: The 'total' score had good to excellent reliability. Fleiss' Kappa scores for all 18 scorable items ranged from slight agreement to moderate agreement. Items with the lowest Kappa scores were revised, and additional feedback from therapists engaged in reliability testing was incorporated, resulting in final version 5.

Keywords: NICU; Development; Feeding; Infant; Outcome; Preterm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Authors have indicated there are no conflicts of interest to report.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Samara M, Johnson S, Lamberts K, Marlow N, Wolke D. Eating problems at age 6 years in a whole population sample of extremely preterm children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:e16–22. - PubMed
    1. de Kieviet JF, Piek JP, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Oosterlaan J. Motor development in very preterm and very low-birth-weight children from birth to adolescence: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;302:2235–42. - PubMed
    1. Thoyre SM, Shaker CS, Pridham KF. The early feeding skills assessment for preterm infants. Neonatal Netw. 2005;24:7–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Philbin MK, Ross ES. The SOFFI Reference Guide: text, algorithms, and appendices: a manualized method for quality bottle-feedings. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011;25:360–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ludwig SM, Waitzman KA. Changing Feeding Documentation to Reflect Infant-Driven Feeding Practice. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2007;7:155–60.