Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Feb;155(2):712-721.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.046. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

An interactive simulation tool for patient-specific clinical decision support in single-ventricle physiology

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

An interactive simulation tool for patient-specific clinical decision support in single-ventricle physiology

Timothy Conover et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: Modeling of single-ventricle circulations has yielded important insights into their unique flow dynamics and physiology. Here we translated a state-of-the-art mathematical model into a patient-specific clinical decision support interactive Web-based simulation tool and show validation for all 3 stages of single-ventricular palliation.

Methods: Via the adoption a validated lumped parameter method, complete cardiovascular-pulmonary circulatory models of all 3 stages of single-ventricle physiology were created within a simulation tool. The closed-loop univentricular heart model includes scaling for growth and respiratory effects, and typical patient-specific parameters are entered through an intuitive user interface. The effects of medical or surgical interventions can be simulated and compared. To validate the simulator, patient parameters were collected from catheterization reports. Four simulator outputs were compared against catheterization findings: pulmonary to systemic flow ratio (Qp:Qs), systemic arterial saturation (SaO2), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAp), and systemic-venous oxygen difference (SaO2-SvO2).

Results: Data from 60 reports were used. Compared with the clinical values, the simulator results were not significantly different in mean Qp:Qs, SaO2, or mPAp (P > .09). There was a statistical but clinically insignificant difference in average SaO-SvO2 (average difference 1%, P < .01). Linear regression analyses revealed a good prediction for each variable (Qp:Qs, R2 = 0.79; SaO2, R2 = 0.64; mPAp, R2 = 0.69; SaO2-SvO2, R2 = 0.93).

Conclusions: This simulator responds quickly and predicts patient-specific hemodynamics with good clinical accuracy. By predicting postoperative and postintervention hemodynamics in all 3 stages of single-ventricle physiology, the simulator could assist in clinical decision-making, training, and consultation. Continuing model refinement and validation will further its application to the bedside.

Keywords: Glenn or superior cavopulmonary circulation; clinical decision support system; computer modeling and simulation; fontan circulation; single ventricle physiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Simulation of single-ventricle physiology … a start.
    Temkit MH, Karamlou T. Temkit MH, et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):722-723. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Oct 20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29103817 No abstract available.
  • Single ventricle i-simulation.
    Bradley SM. Bradley SM. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;155(2):724-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.109. Epub 2017 Nov 7. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29224836 No abstract available.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources