Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2016:2016:6823185.
doi: 10.1155/2016/6823185. Epub 2016 Jul 17.

Assessment of the Nurse Medication Administration Workflow Process

Affiliations
Observational Study

Assessment of the Nurse Medication Administration Workflow Process

Nathan Huynh et al. J Healthc Eng. 2016.

Abstract

This paper presents findings of an observational study of the Registered Nurse (RN) Medication Administration Process (MAP) conducted on two comparable medical units in a large urban tertiary care medical center in Columbia, South Carolina. A total of 305 individual MAP observations were recorded over a 6-week period with an average of 5 MAP observations per RN participant for both clinical units. A key MAP variation was identified in terms of unbundled versus bundled MAP performance. In the unbundled workflow, an RN engages in the MAP by performing only MAP tasks during a care episode. In the bundled workflow, an RN completes medication administration along with other patient care responsibilities during the care episode. Using a discrete-event simulation model, this paper addresses the difference between unbundled and bundled workflow and their effects on simulated redesign interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors indicated no potential competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of iMedTracker.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unbundled MAP workflow.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bundled MAP workflow.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Average MAP task time (error bars indicate one standard deviation).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Timeline belt: (a) unbundled workflow; (b) bundled workflow.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Graphical user interface of MAP simulation model.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Impact of intervention 1 on average (mean) observation duration in minutes (note: base case and scenario 2 have a mixture of unbundled and bundled observations).
Pseudocode 1
Pseudocode 1
MAP computer simulation model high-level pseudocode.
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 1
Bundled workflow data input to simulation model.

References

    1. Ash J. S., Sittig D. F., Poon E. G., Guappone K., Campbell E., Dykstra R. H. The extent and importance of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007;14(4):415–423. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m2373. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niazkhani Z., Pirnejad H., Berg M., Aarts J. The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on inpatient clinical workflow: a literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2009;16(4):539–549. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m2419. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker J. M., Carayon P. From tasks to processes: the case for changing health information technology to improve health care. Health Affairs. 2009;28(2):467–477. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.467. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grossman J., Gourevitch R., Cross D. A. Research Brief Number. 17. Washington, DC, USA: National Institute for Health Care Reform (NIHCR); 2014. Hospital experiences using electronic health records to support medication reconciliation.
    1. Carayon P., Schoofs Hundt A., Karsh B.-T., et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2006;15(supplement 1):i50–i58. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015842. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources