Barriers and Facilitators to the Elimination of Asbestos Related Diseases-Stakeholders' Perspectives
- PMID: 29065497
- PMCID: PMC5664770
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14101269
Barriers and Facilitators to the Elimination of Asbestos Related Diseases-Stakeholders' Perspectives
Abstract
Despite sound scientific knowledge and evidence that any exposure to asbestos fibers in all of its forms, are carcinogenic to humans, its presence, use and trade is still substantial, including in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. Banning the production and use of all forms of asbestos, as recommended by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and WHO, has been proven as the most efficient evidence-based strategy to eliminate Asbestos Related Diseases (ARDs). To effectively move elimination of ARDs forward, attaining a greater understanding of key stakeholders perspectives was identified as an important action. The WHO Regional Office for Europe, the European Centre for Environment and Health, undertook semi-structured interviews, and follow-up discussions with diverse representatives dealing professionally with asbestos. The interview questionnaire was developed based on the current ARDs WHO Report, the Evidence Implementation Model for Public Health and categories of the theory of diffusion. Data were attained on three main questions within the interview questionnaire: (1) Identifying barriers to implementation of WHO evidence-based asbestos recommendations; (2) Describing roles of key stakeholders; and, (3) Proposing possible solutions. The results demonstrated use of sound and convincing scientific evidence along with economic evidence and facilitators can be used to achieve evidence-based policy development, and comprehensive diverse actions.
Keywords: asbestos; barriers; evidence implementation; facilitators.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.
Similar articles
-
Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region-stakeholders' views.Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):812-817. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa074. Eur J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32385509 Free PMC article.
-
How conflicted authors undermine the World Health Organization (WHO) campaign to stop all use of asbestos: spotlight on studies showing that chrysotile is carcinogenic and facilitates other non-cancer asbestos-related diseases.Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015;21(2):176-9. doi: 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000105. Epub 2015 Mar 2. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2015. PMID: 25729927 Free PMC article.
-
Elimination of asbestos use and asbestos-related diseases: an unfinished story.Cancer Sci. 2012 Oct;103(10):1751-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02366.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1. Cancer Sci. 2012. PMID: 22726320 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The global spread of asbestos.Ann Glob Health. 2014 Jul-Aug;80(4):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Nov 25. Ann Glob Health. 2014. PMID: 25459326 Review.
-
Global Asbestos Disaster.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 16;15(5):1000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051000. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29772681 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Engaging Social Stakeholders in National Asbestos Research for Public Health: An Italian Experience.Ann Glob Health. 2025 Jun 5;91(1):25. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4717. eCollection 2025. Ann Glob Health. 2025. PMID: 40487709 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the Environmental Ramifications of Asbestos Fiber Movement Through the Water-Soil Continuum: A Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;22(4):505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040505. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40283732 Free PMC article.
-
Priorities for improving chemicals management in the WHO European Region-stakeholders' views.Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):812-817. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa074. Eur J Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32385509 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Agency for Research on Cancer . Arsenic, Metals, Fibers and Dusts. Volume 100C. A Review of Human Carcinogens. International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 2012.
-
- Offermans N.S., Vermeulen R., Burdorf A., Goldbohm R.A., Keszei A.P., Peters S., Kauppinen T., Kromhout H., van den Brandt P.A. Occupational asbestos exposure and the risk of esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer in the prospective Netherlands—Cohort Study. Int. J. Cancer. 2014;135:1970–1977. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28817. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Allen L.P., Baez J., Stern M.E., George F. Asbestos-Economic Assessment of Bans and Declining Production and Consumption. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2017.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical