Maxillofacial prostheses challenges in resource constrained regions
- PMID: 29065718
- DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1390697
Maxillofacial prostheses challenges in resource constrained regions
Abstract
Background: This study reviewed the current state of maxillofacial rehabilitation in resource-limited nations.
Method: A rigorous literature review was undertaken using several technical and clinical databases using a variety of key words pertinent to maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation and resource-limited areas. In addition, interviews were conducted with researchers, clinicians and prosthetists that had direct experience of volunteering or working in resource-limited countries.
Results: Results from the review and interviews suggest rehabilitating patients in resource-limited countries remains challenging and efforts to improve the situation requires a multifactorial approach.
Conclusions: In conclusion, public health awareness programmes to reduce the causation of injuries and bespoke maxillofacial prosthetics training programmes to suit these countries, as opposed to attempting to replicate Western training programmes. It is also possible that usage of locally sourced and cheaper materials and the use of low-cost technologies could greatly improve maxillofacial rehabilitation efforts in these localities. Implications for Rehabilitation More information and support needs to be provided to maxillofacial defect/injuries patients and to their families or guardians in a culturally sensitive manner by governments. The health needs, economic and psychological needs of the patients need to be taken into account during the rehabilitation process by clinicians and healthcare organizations. The possibility of developing training programs to suit these resource limited countries and not necessarily follow conventional fabrication methods must be looked into further by educational entities.
Keywords: Facial prosthetic; facial disfigurement; maxillofacial; rehabilitation; resource-limited areas.
Similar articles
-
Patient satisfaction with maxillofacial prosthesis. Literature review.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Feb;62(2):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.084. Epub 2008 Dec 6. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009. PMID: 19059015 Review.
-
Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists' and technologists' attitudes and opinions.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Dec;39(12):1186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010. PMID: 20832245
-
Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation.Int J Prosthodont. 2013 Jan-Feb;26(1):57-67. doi: 10.11607/ijp.3220. Int J Prosthodont. 2013. PMID: 23342336 Review.
-
Maxillofacial rehabilitation after rhinectomy using two different treatment options: clinical reports.J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Apr;34(4):311-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01684.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2007. PMID: 17371570
-
Adjuvant therapy for intra oral surgical oncological defect with ancillary prosthesis: A literature review.J Cancer Res Ther. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(2):255-259. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.172118. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018. PMID: 29516904 Review.
Cited by
-
Present and future of extraoral maxillofacial prosthodontics: Cancer rehabilitation.Front Oral Health. 2022 Oct 19;3:1003430. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.1003430. eCollection 2022. Front Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 36338571 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comments on "Comparative Analysis of Tear Strength Across Different Types of Maxillofacial Silicone Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis".Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05212-0. Online ahead of print. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 40858737 No abstract available.
-
Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillofacial prosthesis.J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Mar;12(3):446-451. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1324_22. Epub 2023 Mar 17. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 37122657 Free PMC article.
-
Color translation from monoscopic photogrammetry +ID Methodology into a Polyjet final 3D printed facial prosthesis.F1000Res. 2022 May 27;11:582. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.111196.1. eCollection 2022. F1000Res. 2022. PMID: 38434006 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Superhydrophobic Coating and Nanofiller Loading on Facial Elastomer Physical Properties.Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;15(20):7343. doi: 10.3390/ma15207343. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36295406 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources