Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr;89(4):389-396.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316277. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Apathy: a neurocircuitry model based on frontotemporal dementia

Affiliations
Review

Apathy: a neurocircuitry model based on frontotemporal dementia

Simon Ducharme et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Apathy is a symptom shared among many neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, the underlying neurocircuitry remains incompletely understood. Apathy is one of the core features of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), a neurodegenerative disease presenting with heterogeneous combinations of socioaffective symptoms and executive dysfunction. We reviewed all neuroimaging studies of apathy in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) attempting to refine a neurocircuitry model and inform clinical definitions. Levels of apathy have been consistently shown to correlate with the severity of executive dysfunctions across a wide range of diseases, including FTD. Some authors view 'energisation'-the loss of which is central in apathy-as a core executive function. Apathy in FTD is most robustly associated with atrophy, hypometabolism and/or hypoperfusion in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the anterior and middle cingulate cortex, the orbitofrontal cortex and the medial and ventromedial superior frontal gyri. Data also suggest that abnormalities in connecting white matter pathways and functionally connected more posterior cortical areas could contribute to apathy. There is a lack of consistency across studies due to small samples, lenient statistical thresholds, variable measurement scales and the focus on apathy as a unitary concept. Integrating findings across studies, we revise a neurocircuitry model of apathy divided along three subcomponents (cognition/planning, initiation, emotional-affective/motivation) with specific neuroanatomical and cognitive substrates. To increase consistency in clinical practice, a recommendation is made to modify the bvFTD diagnostic criteria of apathy/inertia. More generally, we argue that bvFTD constitutes a disease model to study the neurocircuitry of complex behaviours as a 'lesion-based' approach to neuropsychiatric symptoms observed across diagnostic categories.

Keywords: neuroimaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neurocircuitry model of the three components of apathy and associated cognitive deficits. (A) Hypothesised main neuroanatomical areas related to three subcomponents of apathy and associated cognitive deficits. (B) Striatal connections of key cortical nodes based on monkey tract tracing. pSMA/SMA has main connections with the medial putamen, DLPFC and DMPFC to dorsal caudate and VMPFC to ventral caudate (nucleus accumbens). (C) Resting state fMRI intrinsic connectivity of key cortical nodes with the striatum in humans corroborating anatomical findings in monkeys. (D) Main resting state intrinsic connectivity networks associated with cortical nodes and related striatal connections. DLPFC, DMPFC and pSMA/SMA are mainly integrated as part of the frontoparietal control network. The VMPFC is integrated within the limbic network. (B–D) Adapted with permission from Choi et al. Organisation of the human striatum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; pSMA/SMA, presupplementary motor area/supplementary motor area; DMPFC, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex; fMRI, functional MRI; pSMA, presupplementary motor area; VMPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011;134:2456–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seeley WW, Zhou J, Kim EJ. Frontotemporal dementia: what can the behavioral variant teach us about human brain organization? Neuroscientist 2012;18:373–85. - PubMed
    1. Lamarre AK, Rascovsky K, Bostrom A, et al. interrater reliability of the new criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2013;80:1973–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris JM, Gall C, Thompson JC, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of FTDC criteria for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2013;80:1881–7. - PubMed
    1. Starkstein SE, Jorge R, Mizrahi R. The prevalence, clinical correlates and treatment of apathy in alzheimer’s disease. The European Journal of Psychiatry 2006;20:96–106.

Publication types

MeSH terms