Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 9:7:21-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2016.12.001. eCollection 2017 Mar.

The interdisciplinary team in type 2 diabetes management: Challenges and best practice solutions from real-world scenarios

Affiliations
Review

The interdisciplinary team in type 2 diabetes management: Challenges and best practice solutions from real-world scenarios

Margaret McGill et al. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. .

Abstract

The Global Partnership for Effective Diabetes Management has previously recommended the implementation of an interdisciplinary team (IDT) approach to type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management as one of 10 practical steps for health care professionals to help more people achieve their glycaemic goal. This article discusses some of the key contributors to success and also the challenges faced when applying IDT care, by examining case studies and examples from around the world. The real-world practices discussed show that implementing successful interdisciplinary care in diabetes is possible despite significant barriers such as established hierarchal structures and financial resource constraints. Instituting collaborative, integrated working relationships among multiple disciplines under strong leadership, together with enhanced and active communication and improved patient access to appropriate specialties is essential. Patients have a crucial role in the management of their own disease and including them as part of the treatment team is also critical. IDTs in diabetes care improve patient outcomes in terms of control of glycaemia and cardiometabolic risk factors, and decreased risk of diabetes complications. Ensuring access to an appropriate IDT, in whatever form, is paramount to enable the best care to be delivered.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Glycaemic control; Integrated care; Interdisciplinary team; Multidisciplinary; Type 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The integrated diabetes care model at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Prince of Wales Hospital using the web-based Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) Programme. *The JADE Programme provided the premise for the implementation of the territory-wide Risk Assessment Management Progamme in diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM) in the community-based clinics coordinated by nurse specialists and general practitioners.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The ‘Leicester model’ – primary care clinic categories. ‘Super six’ – patients on insulin pumps, those with antenatal diabetes, patients requiring diabetic foot care or with low estimated glomerular filtration rate who need dialysis, patients with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes/adolescent diabetes, and people with diabetes who are inpatients .
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Key contributors to a successful IDT in diabetes care.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital: an inter-disciplinary diabetes centre (education is integrated with clinical service and care is shared with primary care.). *Established in 1985. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGill M., Felton A.M. New global recommendations: a multidisciplinary approach to improving outcomes in diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2007;1:49–55. - PubMed
    1. Bailey C.J., Aschner P., Del Prato S., LaSalle J., Ji L., Matthaei S. Global Partnership for Effective Diabetes Management. Individualized glycaemic targets and pharmacotherapy in type 2 diabetes. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013;10:397–409. - PubMed
    1. Shojania K.G., Ranji S.R., McDonald K.M., Grimshaw J.M., Sundaram V., Rushakoff R.J. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA. 2006;296:427–440. - PubMed
    1. Chan J.C., Sui Y., Oldenburg B., Zhang Y., Chung H.H., Goggins W. Effects of telephone-based peer support in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving integrated care: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:972–981. - PubMed
    1. Fung C.S., Chin W.Y., Dai D.S., Kwok R.L., Tsui E.L., Wan Y.F. Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:116. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources