Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;32(4):2101-2105.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5907-0. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Trends in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery® (FLS) certification exam over the past 9 years

Elif Bilgic  1 , Pepa Kaneva  1 , Allan Okrainec  2 , E Matthew Ritter  3 , Steven D Schwaitzberg  4 , Melina C Vassiliou  5   6
Affiliations

Trends in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery® (FLS) certification exam over the past 9 years

Elif Bilgic et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery® (FLS) certification exam assesses both cognitive and manual skills, and has been administered for over a decade. The purpose of this study is to report results over the past 9 years of testing in order to identify trends over time and evaluate the need to update scoring practices. This is a quality initiative of the SAGES FLS committee.

Methods: A representative sample of FLS exam data from 2008 to 2016 was analyzed. The de-identified data included demographics and scores for the cognitive and manual tests. Standard descriptive statistics were used to compare trends over the years, training levels, and to assess the pass/fail rate.

Results: A total of 7232 FLS tests were analyzed [64% male, 6.4% junior (postgraduate year-PGY1-2), 84% senior (PGY3-5), 2.8% fellows (PGY6), and 6.7% attending surgeons (PGY7)]. Specialties included 93% general surgery (GS), 6.2% gynecology, and 0.9% urology. The Pearson correlation between cognitive and manual scores was 0.09. For the cognitive exam, there was an increase in scores over the years, and the most junior residents scored the lowest. For the manual skills, there were marginal differences in scores over the years, and junior residents scored the highest. The odds ratio of PGY3+ passing was 1.8 (CI 1.2-2.8) times higher than that of a PGY1-2. The internal consistency between tasks on the manual skills exam was 0.73. If any one of the tasks was removed, the Cronbach's alpha dropped to between 0.65 and 0.71, depending on the task being removed.

Conclusion: The cognitive and manual components of FLS test different aspects of laparoscopy and demonstrate evidence for reliability and validity. More experienced trainees have a higher likelihood of passing the exam and tend to perform better on the cognitive skills. Each component of the manual skills contributes to the exam and should continue to be part of the test.

Keywords: Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery; Laparoscopy; Simulation; Skill assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2006 May;20(5):744-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1998 Jun;175(6):482-7 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):62-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):518-25; discussion 525-8 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Feb;12(2):210-2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources