Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;145(6):840-846.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_192_16.

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates from clinically significant diarrhoea in patients from a tertiary care centre

Affiliations

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile isolates from clinically significant diarrhoea in patients from a tertiary care centre

Meenakshi Singh et al. Indian J Med Res. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Background & objectives: Clostridium difficile is the primary cause of hospital-acquired colitis in patients receiving antibiotics. The pathogenicity of the organism is mainly due to the production of toxins. This study was conducted to investigate the presence of toxigenic C. difficile in the faecal samples of hospitalized patients suspected to have C. difficile infection (CDI) and corroborating the findings with their clinical and demographic data.

Methods: Diarrhoeic samples obtained from 1110 hospitalized patients were cultured for C. difficile and the isolates confirmed by phenotypic and molecular methods. Toxigenicity of the isolates was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for toxins A and B. Details of patients included in the study were noted and analyzed.

Results: Of the 1110 patients (mean age 39±19.6 yr), 63.9 per cent were males and 36.1 per cent were females. The major antibiotics received by the patients were nitazoxanide (23.9%), penicillins/penicillin combinations (19.0%), quinolones including fluoroquinolones (13.1%), carbapenems (11.5%), glycopeptides (11.0%) and cephalosporins (8.4%). The clinical symptoms predominantly present were watery diarrhoea (56.4%), fever (40.0%) and abdominal pain (35.3%). The underlying diseases were gastrointestinal disorders (52.6%), followed by cancers (13.2%), surgical conditions (8.3%), and hepatic disorders (8.0%). Of the 174 C. difficile isolates, 54.6 per cent were toxigenic. Toxigenic C. difficile was present in all patients with surgical conditions, 65.2 per cent with cancers and 57.1 per cent with gastrointestinal disorders.

Interpretation & conclusions: C. difficile was found to be an important cause of gastrointestinal infections in hospitalized patients with underlying diseases and on antibiotics. Clinical conditions of the patients correlating with toxigenic culture can be an important tool for establishing CDI diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Categorization of antibiotics and other drugs received by patients. ATT, antitubercular treatment; PPI, proton pump inhibitor.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Underlying diseases of the patients admitted to the hospital. GI, gastrointestinal.

References

    1. Blondeau JM. What have we learnt about antimicrobial use and the risk for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea? J Pharm Practice. 2008;21:346–55.
    1. Yearsley KA, Gilby LJ, Ramadas AV, Kubiak EM, Fone DL, Allison MC. Proton pump inhibitor therapy is a risk factor for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:613–9. - PubMed
    1. Kaur S, Vaishnavi C, Ray P, Kochhar R, Prasad KK. Effect of biotherapeutics on cyclosporin-induced Clostridium difficile infection in mice. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:832–8. - PubMed
    1. Khan A, Raza S, Batul SA, Khan M, Aksoy T, Baig MA, et al. The evolution of Clostridium difficile infection in cancer patients: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and guidelines for prevention and management. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2012;7:157–70. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett JG. Clostridium difficile: Old and new observations. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;41:S24–9.

MeSH terms