Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;93(4):550-555.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001966.

Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity

Affiliations

Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity

James M DuBois et al. Acad Med. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

The authors explore five dimensions of research ethics: (1) normative ethics, which includes meta-ethical questions; (2) compliance with regulations, statutes, and institutional policies; (3) the rigor and reproducibility of science; (4) social value; and (5) workplace relationships. Each of the five dimensions is important not only because it addresses an aspect of good research done in a good manner but also because it addresses the concerns of key stakeholders in the research enterprise. The five-dimension framework can guide institutions as they answer three questions central to any research ethics program: (1) Who should champion research ethics? (2) What should interventions look like? and (3) Who should participate in the interventions? The framework is valuable because the answers to these three questions are radically different depending on the dimension under consideration. An expanded vision of research ethics does not entail that institutions should require additional online training or approvals from institutional review boards. However, without acknowledging all five dimensions, programs risk missing an important aspect of research ethics or ignoring the interests of important stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Chart 1
Chart 1
Promoting the Five Dimensions of Research Ethics to Generate a Climate of Research Integrity

Comment in

References

    1. Antes AL. A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance. 2014;21:50–67. - PubMed
    1. Antes AL, Thiel CE, Martin LE, et al. Applying cases to solve ethical problems: The significance of positive and process-oriented reflection. Ethics Behav. 2012;22:113–130. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mumford MD, Connelly S, Brown RP, et al. A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics Behav. 2008;18:315–339. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DuBois JM, Dueker JM. Teaching and assessing the responsible conduct of research: A Delphi consensus panel report. Journal of Research Administration. 2009;40:49–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DuBois JM, Dueker JM, Anderson EE, Campbell J. The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program. Acad Med. 2008;83:596–603. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types