Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles
- PMID: 29068901
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004031
Developing, Conducting, and Publishing Appropriate Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Articles
Abstract
The volume of medical literature is growing at a rate that renders decision-making difficult without specialized summary tools. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are important research instruments used to condense and clarify a broad scope of information into manageable summaries. When used effectively, these reports can pool cumulative data across primary studies, formulate clinical guidelines, and guide future research endeavors. However, errors in study design can result in ineffective or misleading analyses. This article presents the appropriate uses for systematic review and meta-analysis by introducing a framework for creating summary studies, and supplying specific examples of pitfalls in study design and execution.
References
-
- Rosenberg WM, Sackett DL. On the need for evidence-based medicine. Therapie 1996;51:212217.
-
- Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996;312:7172.
-
- Haines T, McKnight L, Duku E, Perry L, Thoma A. The role of systematic reviews in clinical research and practice. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35:207214.
-
- Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001;323:334336.
-
- Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376380.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
