Impact of Patient Subtype and Surgical Variables on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A 12-Year Massachusetts General Hospital Experience
- PMID: 29068923
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003816
Impact of Patient Subtype and Surgical Variables on Abdominoplasty Outcomes: A 12-Year Massachusetts General Hospital Experience
Abstract
Background: The traditional abdominoplasty is one of the most common surgical procedures performed. This study evaluates the impact of different surgical techniques and clinical patient factors on abdominoplasty outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty was performed.
Results: Seven hundred seventy-nine patients with a mean age of 43.7 years and a body mass index of 27 kg/m underwent abdominoplasty. The majority were women (92.9 percent), and massive weight loss was present in 34.8 percent. Abdominoplasty techniques included traditional (59.4 percent), belt lipectomy (17.9 percent), fleur-de-lis (16.4 percent), umbilical float (9.2 percent), and mini-abdominoplasty (2.8 percent). Half of the study population [n = 384 (49.3 percent)] had concurrent surgical procedures. Total complications (23.0 percent) consisted primarily of wound- and scar-related complications (15.3 percent). Approximately 60 percent of patients received heparin chemoprophylaxis, with overall thromboembolic and hematoma rates less than 1 percent. Univariate analysis revealed that massive weight loss (p = 0.04), fleur-de-lis (p = 0.03) or belt lipectomy (p = 0.05) techniques, and concurrent medial thigh lift (p < 0.001) all significantly increased complications. Previous scars, amount of weight loss, operative time, liposuction, and other concurrent procedures did not affect total complications. Male sex (OR, 1.96; p = 0.04), fleur-de-lis technique (OR, 1.71; p = 0.04), and medial thigh lift (OR, 3.3; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for total postoperative complications.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that abdominoplasty alone or in combination with liposuction and aesthetic breast surgery can be performed safely, with an acceptable complication profile.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, III.
References
-
- American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2013 national totals for cosmetic procedures. Available at: https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/Stats2013_3.pdf. Accessed November 29, 2016.
-
- Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank: Statistics 2013. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(Suppl):1S22S.
-
- Zhao Y, Encinosa W. Bariatric surgery utilization and outcomes in 1998 and 2004: Statistical brief #23. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. 2007:Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 17.
-
- American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery fact sheets: Metabolic and bariatric surgery. Available at: https://asmbs.org/resources/metabolic-and-bariatric-surgery. Accessed November 29, 2016.
-
- Neaman KC, Hansen JE. Analysis of complications from abdominoplasty: A review of 206 cases at a university hospital. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:292298.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials