Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Oct 24;7(10):e014145.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014145.

Prevalence of key breastfeeding indicators in 29 sub-Saharan African countries: a meta-analysis of demographic and health surveys (2010-2015)

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of key breastfeeding indicators in 29 sub-Saharan African countries: a meta-analysis of demographic and health surveys (2010-2015)

Abukari Ibrahim Issaka et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To carry out a meta-analysis to assess the prevalence of four key breastfeeding indicators in four subregions of 29 sub-Saharan African countries.

Design, settings and participants: The 29 countries were categorised into four subregions, and using cross-sectional data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (2010-2015) of these countries prevalence of each of four key breastfeeding indicators was estimated for each of the subregions by carrying out a meta-analysis. Due to the presence of significant heterogeneity among the various surveys (I2>50%), a random-effect analytic model was used, and sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effects of outliers.

Main outcome variables: Early initiation of breast feeding, exclusive breast feeding, predominant breast feeding and bottle feeding.

Results: The overall prevalence of early initiation of breast feeding varied between a lowest of 37.84% (95% CI 24.62 to 51.05) in Central Africa to a highest of 69.31% (95% CI 67.65 to 70.97) in Southern Africa; the overall prevalence of exclusive breast feeding ranged between a lowest of 23.70% (95% CI 5.37 to 42.03) in Central Africa to a highest of 56.57% (95% CI 53.50 to 59.95) in Southern Africa; the overall prevalence of predominant breast feeding ranged between a lowest of 17.63% (95% CI 12.70 to 22.55) in East Africa and a highest of 46.37% (95% CI 37.22 to 55.52) in West Africa; while the prevalence of bottle feeding varied between a lowest of 8.17% (95% CI 5.51 to 10.84) in West Africa and a highest of 30.05% (95% CI 28.42 to 31.69) in Southern Africa.

Conclusions: West Africa and Central Africa recorded lower overall prevalence of early initiation of breast feeding and exclusive breast feeding than the WHO's recommended target of 50% by the year 2025. Intervention for improved breastfeeding practices in sub-Saharan Africa should target West and Central Africa, while intervention to minimise bottle feeding should target Southern Africa.

Keywords: community child health; epidemiology; health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow scheme for country selection based on the exclusion and inclusion criteria. DHS, Demographic and Health Surveys.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of early initiation of breast feeding in 28 sub-Saharan African countries (2010–2015). Congo Bra, Congo Brazzaville; Congo DR, Democratic Republic of Congo; DHS, Demographic and Health Surveys.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence of exclusive breast feeding in 28 sub-Saharan African countries (2010–2015). Congo Bra, Congo Brazzaville; Congo DR, Democratic Republic of Congo; DHS, Demographic and Health Surveys.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Prevalence of predominant breast feeding in 28 sub-Saharan African countries (2010–2015). Congo Bra, Congo Brazzaville; Congo DR, Democratic Republic of Congo; DHS, Demographic and Health Surveys.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Prevalence of bottle feeding in 28 sub-Saharan African countries (2010–2015). Congo Bra, Congo Brazzaville; Congo DR, Democratic Republic of Congo; DHS, Demographic and Health Surveys.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Unicef for child. Improving breastfeeding, complementary foods and feeding practices. https://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_breastfeeding.html
    1. USAID. Nutrition in the first 1,000 days. New York, USA: USAID, 2012.
    1. WHO. Exclusive breastfeeding Nutrition. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/exclusive_breastfeeding/en/
    1. León-Cava N, Lutter C, Ross J, et al. . Quantifying the benefits of breastfeeding: a summary of the evidence. PAHO Washington, DC, 2002.
    1. Horta BL, Bahl R, Martines JC, et al. . Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007.

Publication types