Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 15;596(2):253-266.
doi: 10.1113/JP274896. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision

Affiliations

Immediate cortical adaptation in visual and non-visual areas functions induced by monovision

Fabrizio Zeri et al. J Physiol. .

Abstract

Key points: Monovision is an optical correction for presbyopes that consists of correcting one eye for far distance and the other for near distance, creating a superimposition of an in-focus with a blurred image. Brain adaptation to monovision was studied in unexperienced observers by measuring visual evoked potentials from 64-channels. The first clear effect of monovision on visual evoked potentials was the C1 amplitude reduction, indicating that the unilateral blurring induced by monovision reduces feed-forward activity in primary visual area. Monovision led also to an increased amplitude of the P1 and pP1 components, with the latter originating in prefrontal regions. This effect probably works as an attentional compensatory activity used to compensate for the degraded V1 signal.

Abstract: A common and often successful option to correct presbyopia with contact lenses is monovision. This is an unbalanced correction across the two eyes where one eye is corrected for far vision and the other eye is corrected for near vision. Monovision is therefore a form of acquired anisometropia that causes a superimposition of an in-focus image with a blurred image. In spite of this visual anisometropia, monovision has been successfully used for many decadesl however the brain mechanism supporting monovision is not well understood. The present study aimed to measure the visual evoked potentials with a high-density electrode array (64-channel) in a group of presbyopes and to provide a detailed spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical activity after a short period of adaptation to monovision with contact lenses. When compared with a balanced eye near correction, monovision produced both a clear reduction of the earliest visual evoked potential components, the C1 and the N1, and an amplitude increase of the P1 and pP1. These results indicate that the unilateral blurring induced by wearing monovision contact lenses reduces feed-forward activity in the primary visual area and feedback activity in extrastriate areas (C1 and N1 reduction). Interestingly, other brain activities in both extrastriate visual areas (the P1 component) and in the anterior insula (the pP1 component) appear to compensate for this dysfunction, increasing their activity during monovision. These changes confirm the presence of fluid brain adaptation in visual and non-visual areas during monocular interferences.

Keywords: monovision; suppression; visual-evoked potential (VEP).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stimuli used in the VEP experiment
(A) Large and (B) small letter matrix used as stimuli in the VEP experiment.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Grand‐averaged waveforms from the VEP experiment for Stereovision and Monovision coditions
Grand‐averaged waveforms of the VEP from stereovision (blue lines) and monovision (red lines) conditions displayed on the most relevant site: medial prefrontal (Fpz), medial central‐parietal (CPz), medial occipital (Oz) and parietal‐occipital (PO7). The other factors (i.e. distance and spatial frequency) are averaged together. The components are labelled. Time zero represents the stimulus onset and the asterisk (*) refers to the significant difference between conditions. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Topographical maps
Scalp topography of the grand‐averaged data for stereovision (top) and monovision (bottom) using top‐flat view maps (120°) arranged in a chronological order from left to right. The components are labelled and green arrows indicate the surface origin of the relative component. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Grand‐averaged waveforms from the VEP experiment divided for condition, viewing distance and spatial frequency
Grand‐averaged waveforms of the VEP from stereovision (blue lines) and monovision (red lines) conditions reported separately for the viewing distance (A) and spatial frequency (B). For viewing distance, the continuous lines represent the near distance, whereas the dotted lines represent the far distance. For spatial frequency, the continuous lines represent the low spatial frequency (3.75 cycle deg−1) and the dotted lines represent the high spatial frequency (9.6 cycle deg−1). The waveforms are displayed on the most relevant site: medial prefrontal (Fpz), medial central‐parietal (CPz), medial occipital (Oz) and parietal‐occipital (PO7). The considered components are labelled and time zero represents stimulus onset. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amigo G, Fiorentini A, Pirchio M & Spinelli D (1978). Binocular vision tested with visual evoked potentials in children and infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17, 910–915. - PubMed
    1. Antona B, Barra F, Barrio A, Gutierrez A, Piedrahita E & Martin Y (2008). Comparing methods of determining addition in presbyopes. Clin Exp Optom 9, 313–318. - PubMed
    1. Apkarian PA, Nakayama K & Tyler CW (1981). Binocularity in the human visual evoked potential: facilitation, summation and suppression. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 51, 32–48. - PubMed
    1. Arden GB, Barnard WM & Mushin AS (1974). Visually evoked responses in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 58, 183–192. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Back A, Grant T & Hine N (1992). Comparative visual performance of three presbyopic contact lens corrections. Optom Vis Sci 69, 474–480. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources