Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;38(1):46-50.
doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.1.46.

Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panel 1/2/3 Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses with Influenza A Virus subtyping

Affiliations

Evaluation of Allplex Respiratory Panel 1/2/3 Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses with Influenza A Virus subtyping

Jaehyeon Lee et al. Ann Lab Med. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

The Allplex Respiratory Panel 1/2/3 (All16) is a multiplex PCR assay for detecting 16 respiratory viruses with influenza A virus (FluA) subtyping, and the first clinical assay based on multiple detection temperatures. We compared the results between All16 and Anyplex II RV16 (Any16) in 426 clinical samples. Samples showing discrepancies between the two tests were further tested using monoplex PCR. FluA subtyping based on the hemagglutinin type results of All16, which yielded H1, H3, and non-H1/H3, was compared with the results of the BioFire FilmArray respiratory panel. The positive and negative percent agreements and kappa value for each virus between All16 and Any16 ranged from 54.5-100.0%, 84.7-100.0%, and 0.57-1.00, respectively. FluA subtype results from All16 for 26 samples were consistent with those from FilmArray. Good agreement was observed between the two methods, except when analyzing human enterovirus (kappa value 0.70), and the All16 showed reliable FluA subtyping results. For parainfluenza virus 3, the All16 was more sensitive than Any16. When testing 28 samples simultaneously, the mean test time and hands-on time were 4.3 and 0.5 hours, respectively in All16. In conclusion, All16 showed reliable performance, but further studies are needed regarding human enterovirus analysis.

Keywords: Evaluation; Influenza A subtyping; Multiplex real-time PCR; Respiratory Virus; Reverse transcriptase-PCR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ginocchio CC. Detection of respiratory viruses using non-molecular based methods. J Clin Virol. 2007;40(Suppl 1):S11–S14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahony JB, Blackhouse G, Babwah J, Smieja M, Buracond S, Chong S, et al. Cost analysis of multiplex PCR testing for diagnosing respiratory virus infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:2812–2817. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA, et al., editors. American Society for Microbiology. Manual of clinical microbiology. 11th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2015. pp. 1432–1435.
    1. Lee YJ, Kim D, Lee K, Chun JY. Single-channel multiplexing without melting curve analysis in real-time PCR. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7439. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fu G, Miles A, Alphey L. Multiplex detection and SNP genotyping in a single fluorescence channel. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30340. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources