Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2017 Aug:20:29-33.
doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 2.

Effect of an intradialytic protein-rich meal intake in nutritional and body composition parameters on hemodialysis patients

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Effect of an intradialytic protein-rich meal intake in nutritional and body composition parameters on hemodialysis patients

Cristina Caetano et al. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Background and aims: Protein intake is a key point to maintain an adequate nutritional status in hemodialysis (HD) patients. There are some studies that confirm the positive influence of intradialytic oral nutritional supplementation in several nutritional parameters in HD patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an intradialytic protein rich meal in nutritional and body composition parameters on HD patients.

Methods: This was a 6-months single center non-randomized study with 99 patients in HD from one Nephrocare dialysis unit in Portugal. Patients in the intervention group (IG) presented one albumin value ≤ 3.8 g/dL in the two measurements prior to the beginning of the study. The IG ate a protein rich meal during each treatment. The control group (CG) continued to eat their usual snack brought from home. Albumin, nPCR, potassium, phosphorus, C-reactive protein (CRP), dry weight and body composition were measured at baseline and at the end of the study.

Results: Patient's mean age was 69.9 ± 12.9 years and HD vintage, 60.0 ± 50.5 months. Both groups were similar at the start of the study, except in albumin (p = 0.019). After the intervention, protein intake increased in the IG (p = 0.001). Albumin decreased in both groups but this difference was higher and only statistically significant in the CG (p = 0.039). Regarding body composition, in the CG, the fat tissue index (FTI) (p = 0.022) and the lean tissue index (LTI) (p = 0.003) diminished after the 6 months of the follow-up. However, in the IG the LTI value also reduced (p = 0.008) but FTI increased (p = <0.001) at the end of the study. There were no statistically significant differences on dry weight, potassium, phosphorus, and CRP.

Conclusion: Apart from the effect on protein intake, the importance of this study relies on the positive changes in regard to patient's body composition obtained after 6 months of an intradialytic intake of a protein rich meal during the HD treatment. This type of intervention can contribute to ameliorate patient's nutritional status without a negative effect on other parameters.

Keywords: Body composition; Hemodialysis; Intradialytic meal; Nutritional status; Protein intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources