Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):70-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 5.

When limited by cost in CRT-be a leftist!

Affiliations
Editorial

When limited by cost in CRT-be a leftist!

Aniruddha Vyas et al. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017 May-Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The QRS morphologies with variable AV delays at Atrial Sense (AS) and Left Ventricle Pace (LVP) to create fused complexes.

References

    1. Rai M.K., Prabhu M.A., Sharma A., Vekariya R., Kamath P., Pai N., Kamath R.L. ‘Optimized’ LV only pacing using a dual chamber pacemaker as a cost effective alternative to CRT. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017;17(3):72–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leyva F., Nisam S., Auricchio A. 20 Years of cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC. 2014;64(10) - PubMed
    1. Faghfourian B., Homayoonfar S., Rezvanjoo M., Poorolajal J. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of biventricular versus left ventricular only pacing in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: a before–after clinical trial. J Arrhythm. 2017;33(2):127–129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rajni K.R., Kumar U.N., Schafer J. Reduced ventricular volumes and improved systolic. Function with cardiac resynchronization therapy a randomized trial comparing simultaneous biventricular pacing, sequential biventricular pacing, and left ventricular pacing. Circulation. 2007;115:2136–2144. - PubMed
    1. Saxon L.A. Left ventricular versus biventricular for cardiac resynchronization therapy comparable but not equal. Circulation. 2011;124:2803–2804. - PubMed

Publication types