Comment
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120604.
Epub 2017 Oct 26.
[French comment on article Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy]
[Article in
French]
- PMID: 29073707
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-120604
Item in Clipboard
Comment
[French comment on article Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy]
[Article in
French]
Endoscopy.
2017 Nov.
No abstract available
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Comment on
-
Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy.Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1075-1086. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117400. Epub 2017 Sep 22. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 28938500 Clinical Trial.
Similar articles
-
Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Aug;18(4):471-2. doi: 10.1188/14.CJON.471-472. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014. PMID: 25095304 Review.
-
Acceptability of two colorectal cancer screening tests: pain as a key determinant in sigmoidoscopy.Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1075-1086. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-117400. Epub 2017 Sep 22. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 28938500 Clinical Trial.
-
[French comment on article Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme].Endoscopy. 2017 Jan;49(1):103-104. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-123546. Epub 2017 Jan 9. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 28068722 French. No abstract available.
-
Colorectal cancer screening: with pain, no gain.Endoscopy. 2017 Nov;49(11):1031-1032. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118216. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Endoscopy. 2017. PMID: 29073695 No abstract available.
-
Screening for colorectal cancer.Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1994:79-84. Curr Opin Gen Surg. 1994. PMID: 7584018 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
