Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;98(2):181-190.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Temperature-controlled airflow ventilation in operating rooms compared with laminar airflow and turbulent mixed airflow

M Alsved  1 , A Civilis  2 , P Ekolind  3 , A Tammelin  4 , A Erichsen Andersson  5 , J Jakobsson  1 , T Svensson  1 , M Ramstorp  1 , S Sadrizadeh  6 , P-A Larsson  2 , M Bohgard  1 , T Šantl-Temkiv  7 , J Löndahl  8
Affiliations
Free article

Temperature-controlled airflow ventilation in operating rooms compared with laminar airflow and turbulent mixed airflow

M Alsved et al. J Hosp Infect. 2018 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate three types of ventilation systems for operating rooms with respect to air cleanliness [in colony-forming units (cfu/m3)], energy consumption and comfort of working environment (noise and draught) as reported by surgical team members.

Methods: Two commonly used ventilation systems, vertical laminar airflow (LAF) and turbulent mixed airflow (TMA), were compared with a newly developed ventilation technique, temperature-controlled airflow (TcAF). The cfu concentrations were measured at three locations in an operating room during 45 orthopaedic procedures: close to the wound (<40cm), at the instrument table and peripherally in the room. The operating team evaluated the comfort of the working environment by answering a questionnaire.

Findings: LAF and TcAF, but not TMA, resulted in less than 10cfu/m3 at all measurement locations in the room during surgery. Median values of cfu/m3 close to the wound (250 samples) were 0 for LAF, 1 for TcAF and 10 for TMA. Peripherally in the room, the cfu concentrations were lowest for TcAF. The cfu concentrations did not scale proportionally with airflow rates. Compared with LAF, the power consumption of TcAF was 28% lower and there was significantly less disturbance from noise and draught.

Conclusion: TcAF and LAF remove bacteria more efficiently from the air than TMA, especially close to the wound and at the instrument table. Like LAF, the new TcAF ventilation system maintained very low levels of cfu in the air, but TcAF used substantially less energy and provided a more comfortable working environment than LAF. This enables energy savings with preserved air quality.

Keywords: Air sampling; BioTrak; Energy efficiency; Fluorescence; Surgical site infection; Temperature-controlled ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer