Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct 18:23:44.
doi: 10.1186/s40409-017-0135-6. eCollection 2017.

It is time for top-down venomics

Affiliations
Review

It is time for top-down venomics

Rafael D Melani et al. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

The protein composition of animal venoms is usually determined by peptide-centric proteomics approaches (bottom-up proteomics). However, this technique cannot, in most cases, distinguish among toxin proteoforms, herein called toxiforms, because of the protein inference problem. Top-down proteomics (TDP) analyzes intact proteins without digestion and provides high quality data to identify and characterize toxiforms. Denaturing top-down proteomics is the most disseminated subarea of TDP, which performs qualitative and quantitative analyzes of proteoforms up to ~30 kDa in high-throughput and automated fashion. On the other hand, native top-down proteomics provides access to information on large proteins (> 50 kDA) and protein interactions preserving non-covalent bonds and physiological complex stoichiometry. The use of native and denaturing top-down venomics introduced novel and useful techniques to toxinology, allowing an unprecedented characterization of venom proteins and protein complexes at the toxiform level. The collected data contribute to a deep understanding of venom natural history, open new possibilities to study the toxin evolution, and help in the development of better biotherapeutics.

Keywords: Denaturing top-down proteomics; Native top-down proteomics; Top-down proteomics; Toxiforms; Venomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Graphical representation of generic bottom-up (left panel) and top-down (right panel) venomics experiments. On the left panel, venom proteins are reduced, alkylated, enzymatically digested, and submitted to LC-MS/MS for peptide identification; toxins are inferred resulting in more protein possibilities than the original number of toxiforms (inference problem). On the right panel, venom is pre-fractionated before LC-MS/MS resulting in the identification and characterization of all toxiforms present in the initial sample
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fragmentation maps of acidic phospholipase A2 2 (Q9DF33) and weak toxin DE-1 (P01412) toxiforms from Ophiophagus hannah venom. Gray squares represent amino acid alterations from the deposited sequence in UniProt database and the orange square represents a pyroglutamic acid. Data from Melani et al. [13] used to create this image are freely available at ProteomeExchange identifier PXD003403. Fragmentation maps, scoring and residue coverage were obtained using the software ProSight Lite

References

    1. Kardong KV. Snake toxins and venoms: an evolutionary perspective. Herpetologica. 1996;52(1):36–46.
    1. de Lima ME, Pimenta AMC, Martin-Eauclaire MF, Zingali RB, Rochat H. Animal toxins: state of the art. Perspectives in health and biotechnology. 1. UFMG: Belo Horizonte; 2009.
    1. Kordis D, Gubensek F. Adaptive evolution of animal toxin multigene families. Gene. 2000;261(1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00490-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fox JW, Serrano SMT. Exploring snake venom proteomes: multifaceted analyses for complex toxin mixtures. Proteomics. 2008;8(4):909–920. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700777. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Georgieva D, Arni RK, Betzel C. Proteome analysis of snake venom toxins: pharmacological insights. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2008;5(6):787–797. doi: 10.1586/14789450.5.6.787. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources