Aligning In-Service Training Examinations in Plastic Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery With Competency-Based Education
- PMID: 29075389
- PMCID: PMC5646927
- DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00116.1
Aligning In-Service Training Examinations in Plastic Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery With Competency-Based Education
Abstract
Background: In-service training examinations (ITEs) are used to assess residents across specialties. However, it is not clear how they are integrated with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones and competencies.
Objective: This study explored the distribution of specialty-specific milestones and competencies in ITEs for plastic surgery and orthopaedic surgery.
Methods: In-service training examinations were publicly available for plastic surgery (PSITE) and orthopaedics (OITE). Questions on the PSITE for 2014-2016 and the OITE for 2013-2015 were mapped to the specialty-specific milestones and the 6 competencies.
Results: There was an uneven distribution of milestones and competencies in ITE questions. Nine of the 36 Plastic Surgery Milestones represented 52% (341 of 650) of questions, and 3 were not included in the ITE. Of 41 Orthopaedic Surgery Milestones, 7 represented 51% (201 of 394) of questions, and 5 had no representation on the ITE. Among the competencies, patient care was the most common (PSITE = 62% [403 of 650]; OITE = 59% [233 of 394]), followed by medical knowledge (PSITE = 34% [222 of 650]; OITE = 31% [124 of 394]). Distribution of the remaining competencies differed between the 2 specialties (PSITE = 4% [25 of 650]; OITE = 9% [37 of 394]).
Conclusions: The ITEs tested slightly more than half of the milestones for the 2 specialties, and focused predominantly on patient care and medical knowledge competencies.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Figures


References
-
- Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, et al. . General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002; 21 5: 103– 111. - PubMed
-
- Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, et al. . The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366 11: 1051– 1056. - PubMed
-
- Beeson MS, Holmboe ES, Korte RC, et al. . Initial validity analysis of the emergency medicine milestones. Acad Emerg Med. 2015; 22 7: 838– 844. - PubMed
-
- Cantor AD, Eslick AN, Marsh EJ, et al. . Multiple-choice tests stabilize access to marginal knowledge. Mem Cognit. 2015; 43 2: 193– 205. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources