Predictors for earlier return to work of cancer patients
- PMID: 29076003
- PMCID: PMC5884890
- DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0655-7
Predictors for earlier return to work of cancer patients
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to investigate how perceived work ability, job self-efficacy, value of work, and fatigue predict return to work (RTW) in cancer patients who received chemotherapy.
Methods: Data of a before-after study on a multidisciplinary intervention that aimed to enhance RTW was used, consisting of four assessments up to 18 months. Time to partial and full RTW of 76 and 81 participants, respectively, was analyzed in Cox proportional hazard analysis with time-dependent variables. Univariate analyses of work ability, job self-efficacy, value of work, or fatigue as covariates were succeeded by multivariate analyses of work ability and either job self-efficacy, value of work, or fatigue as covariates.
Results: Participants were mostly female (93%), and diagnosed with breast cancer (87%). Most participants were permanently employed (84%) and 48% was sole breadwinner. When adjusted for timing variables and prognostic factors, all hypothesized factors were predictive for earlier RTW (p < .05). In models that also included work ability, only job self-efficacy significantly predicted earlier full RTW: hazard ratio = 1.681; p = .025.
Conclusions: Lower fatigue and higher value of work, work ability, and job self-efficacy of cancer survivors are associated with earlier RTW. Work ability and job self-efficacy seem to be key predictors.
Implications for cancer survivors: Limiting fatigue, increasing value of work, job self-efficacy, and perceived work ability are promising goals for enhancing earlier RTW. Occupational rehabilitation should empower patients to organize appropriate conditions for work and to educate them on rights and obligations during sick leave.
Keywords: Chemotherapy; Fatigue; Occupational health; Return to work; Self-efficacy; Work ability.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Academic Medical Center Amsterdam was obtained, as well as from both medical centers that participated (NL 35864.018.11).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Return to work of cancer patients after a multidisciplinary intervention including occupational counselling and physical exercise in cancer patients: a prospective study in the Netherlands.BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e014746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014746. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28619770 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation--a prospective study.Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 Jan;39(1):76-87. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3291. Epub 2012 Mar 15. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013. PMID: 22422040
-
Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure-results from a prospective study.Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):3007-3015. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3790-9. Epub 2017 Jul 11. Support Care Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28698950
-
Barriers and opportunities for return-to-work of cancer survivors: time for action--rapid review and expert consultation.Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 24;5:35. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0210-z. Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26912175 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perceived employer-related barriers and facilitators for work participation of cancer survivors: A systematic review of employers' and survivors' perspectives.Psychooncology. 2018 Mar;27(3):725-733. doi: 10.1002/pon.4514. Epub 2017 Sep 6. Psychooncology. 2018. PMID: 28753741
Cited by
-
Patient-reported outcomes from a workplace intervention program for cancer survivors highlight ongoing needs to support continuation of work.Support Care Cancer. 2019 Nov;27(11):4377-4384. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04964-1. Epub 2019 Jul 8. Support Care Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31281940 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer survivors and adverse work outcomes: associated factors and supportive interventions.Br Med Bull. 2023 Apr 5;145(1):60-71. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldac028. Br Med Bull. 2023. PMID: 36372773 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk factors for return to work in colorectal cancer survivors.Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(12):3938-3951. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3952. Epub 2021 May 14. Cancer Med. 2021. PMID: 33991067 Free PMC article.
-
The Positive Effects of Cancer Survivor Support Service on Distress in South Korea: A Nationwide Prospective Study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 14;9:769221. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.769221. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35237619 Free PMC article.
-
Return to Work and Work Productivity During the First Year After Cancer Treatment.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 12;13:866346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866346. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35496253 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases