Can System Truncation Speed up Ligand-Binding Calculations with Periodic Free-Energy Simulations?
- PMID: 29076739
- DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00324
Can System Truncation Speed up Ligand-Binding Calculations with Periodic Free-Energy Simulations?
Abstract
We have investigated whether alchemical free-energy perturbation calculations of relative binding energies can be sped up by simulating a truncated protein. Previous studies with spherical nonperiodic systems showed that the number of simulated atoms could be reduced by a factor of 26 without affecting the calculated binding free energies by more than 0.5 kJ/mol on average ( Genheden, S.; Ryde, U. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012 , 8 , 1449 ), leading to a 63-fold decrease in the time consumption. However, such simulations are rather slow, owing to the need of a large cutoff radius for the nonbonded interactions. Periodic simulations with the electrostatics treated by Ewald summation are much faster. Therefore, we have investigated if a similar speed-up can be obtained also for periodic simulations. Unfortunately, our results show that it is harder to truncate periodic systems and that the truncation errors are larger for these systems. In particular, residues need to be removed from the calculations, which means that atoms have to be restrained to avoid that they move in an unrealistic manner. The results strongly depend on the strength on this restraint. For the binding of seven ligands to dihydrofolate reductase and ten inhibitors of blood-clotting factor Xa, the best results are obtained with a small restraining force constant. However, the truncation errors were still significant (e.g., 1.5-2.9 kJ/mol at a truncation radius of 10 Å). Moreover, the gain in computer time was only modest. On the other hand, if the snapshots are truncated after the MD simulations, the truncation errors are small (below 0.9 kJ/mol even for a truncation radius of 10 Å). This indicates that postprocessing with a more accurate energy function (e.g., with quantum chemistry) on truncated snapshots may be a viable approach.
Similar articles
-
Can MM/GBSA calculations be sped up by system truncation?J Comput Chem. 2018 Mar 15;39(7):361-372. doi: 10.1002/jcc.25120. Epub 2017 Nov 26. J Comput Chem. 2018. PMID: 29178493
-
Improving the Efficiency of Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations by System Truncation.J Chem Theory Comput. 2012 Apr 10;8(4):1449-58. doi: 10.1021/ct200853g. Epub 2012 Mar 12. J Chem Theory Comput. 2012. PMID: 26596755
-
The normal-mode entropy in the MM/GBSA method: effect of system truncation, buffer region, and dielectric constant.J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Aug 27;52(8):2079-88. doi: 10.1021/ci3001919. Epub 2012 Aug 2. J Chem Inf Model. 2012. PMID: 22817270
-
Ligand-Binding Affinity Estimates Supported by Quantum-Mechanical Methods.Chem Rev. 2016 May 11;116(9):5520-66. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00630. Epub 2016 Apr 14. Chem Rev. 2016. PMID: 27077817 Review.
-
Towards understanding the mechanisms of molecular recognition by computer simulations of ligand-protein interactions.J Mol Recognit. 1999 Nov-Dec;12(6):371-89. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199911/12)12:6<371::AID-JMR479>3.0.CO;2-O. J Mol Recognit. 1999. PMID: 10611647 Review.
Cited by
-
A Computationally Efficient Method to Generate Plausible Conformers for Ensemble Docking and Binding Free Energy Calculations.J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Aug 11;65(15):8137-8157. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00431. Epub 2025 Jul 23. J Chem Inf Model. 2025. PMID: 40696994 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources