Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr 10:3:55.
doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.03.04. eCollection 2017.

Transition from video-assisted thoracic surgery to robotic pulmonary surgery

Affiliations
Review

Transition from video-assisted thoracic surgery to robotic pulmonary surgery

Takashi Suda. J Vis Surg. .

Abstract

The "da Vinci Surgical System" is a robotic surgical system that utilizes multi-jointed robotic arms and a high-resolution three-dimensional video-monitoring system. We report on the state of transition from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to robotic pulmonary surgery, the surgical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to VATS, and the future of robotic surgery. Surgery utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System requires a console surgeon and assistant who have been certified by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., the system manufacturer. On the basis of the available medical literature, a robotic lobectomy has a learning curve that extends over approximately 20 cases for a surgeon who has mastered VATS. Surgery using the da Vinci System is safe, is associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates than thoracotomy, leads to shorter postoperative hospital stays, and ensures improved postoperative quality of life. Currently, no prospective studies comparing it to VATS have been conducted. The various studies that have compared robotic surgery and VATS have reported different results. At the present time, the benefits to patients of robotic surgery compared to VATS remain unclear. Areas in which robotic surgery may be superior to VATS include the superior operability of robotic surgery that improves safety and decreases the incidence of complication. To show that the costly robotic surgery is superior to VATS, prospective multicenter randomized studies need to be conducted. The da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system has already been highly evaluated for its safety, with recent studies reporting satisfactory outcomes. It remains necessary to verify whether the benefits to patients justify the higher cost of robotic surgery. Future developments in the field of robotic engineering will likely lead to the creation of systems that are even less invasive and allow for more advanced surgical techniques.

Keywords: Robot; lung; minimally invasive surgery; robotics; thoracoscopy/VATS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Placement of the da Vinci port for left lung cancer surgery. (A) A port held in the surgeon’s left hand is inserted above the fifth intercostal anterior axillary line; (B) a 3-cm skin incision is made above the sixth intercostal medial axillary line, and a GelPOINT Mini (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) is affixed for the camera scope and manipulations by the surgical assistant; (C,D) ports are inserted by the surgeon’s right hand above the seventh intercostal posterior axillary line and more dorsally than the posterior axillary line of the seventh intercostal space. The two ports must be spaced at a minimum of 6 cm apart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Placement of instruments during left lung surgery using the da Vinci Xi Surgical System. As the da Vinci surgical cart is docked to the side of the patient, the anesthesiologist can manage sedation from the patient’s head without interfering with the da Vinci instruments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Left upper lobectomy using da Vinci Xi System (2). Available online: http://www.asvide.com/articles/1456

References

    1. McKenna RJ, Jr, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:421-5; discussion 425-6. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suda T. Left upper lobectomy using da Vinci Xi System. Asvide 2017;4:148. Available online: http://www.asvide.com/articles/1456
    1. Melfi FM, Mussi A. Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin 2008;18:289-95, vi-vii. 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.06.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, et al. Robot assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:380-4. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee BE, Korst RJ, Klersman E, et al. Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:724-9. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.002 - DOI - PubMed