Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep 14:3:125.
doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.08.23. eCollection 2017.

Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art

Affiliations
Review

Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art

Marco Taurchini et al. J Vis Surg. .

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is the eight most common cancer in the world and surgical resection remains the gold standard not only in providing the optimal chance for cure but also the best palliation for dysphagia. Esophagectomy is a complex operation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality that are reported as 23-50% and 2-8% in western country. At the moment no gold standard techniques exist for esophagectomy. The choice of the technique depends on several factors; location of tumor and surgeon's experience are probably the most relevant. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), performed in high volume centers, has shown to reduce the rate of complications with the same oncological outcome as open esophagectomy. The addition of robotic technique to MIE is relatively new and is gaining widespread acceptance. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is safe and feasible, and its short-term results are comparable to conventional MIE. Randomized studies are needed to assess if there is any real benefit associated to the use of the robotic approach.

Keywords: Minimally invasive; esophagectomy; robotic assisted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart search strategy.

References

    1. Mu J, Gao S, Mao Y, et al. Open three stage transthoracic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. BMJ Open 2015;5:e008328. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008328 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic esophagectomy trough a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992;37:7-11. - PubMed
    1. Kauppila JH, Xie S, Johar A, et al. Meta-analysis of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2017;104:1131-40. 10.1002/bjs.10577 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Stirling MC. Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:265. - PubMed
    1. Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli E, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. The American Surgeon 2003;69:624-6. - PubMed