Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;53(6):754-763.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

A Randomized Trial of Incentives for Smoking Treatment in Medicaid Members

David L Fraser  1 , Michael C Fiore  2 , Kate Kobinsky  1 , Robert Adsit  1 , Stevens S Smith  3 , Mimi L Johnson  4 , Timothy B Baker  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized Trial of Incentives for Smoking Treatment in Medicaid Members

David L Fraser et al. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Low-income populations are especially likely to smoke and have difficulty quitting. This study evaluated a monetary incentive intended to increase smoking treatment engagement and abstinence among Medicaid recipients who smoke.

Study design: Two-group randomized clinical trial of Incentive (n=948) and Control interventions (n=952) for smoking.

Setting/participants: Medicaid recipients recruited from primary care patients (n=920) and callers to the Wisconsin Tobacco Quit Line (n=980).

Intervention: Participants were offered five quitline cessation calls and were encouraged to obtain cessation medication (covered by Medicaid). All participants received payment for completing a baseline assessment and a 6-month smoking test. Only Incentive condition participants received compensation for taking counseling calls ($30 per call) and for biochemically verified abstinence at the 6-month visit ($40).

Main outcome measures: Seven-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence 6-months post study entry and cost/quit.

Results: Incentive condition participants had significantly higher biochemically determined 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates 6 months after study induction than did Controls (21.6% vs 13.8%, respectively, p<0.0001). A positive treatment effect of incentives was present across other abstinence indices, but the size of effects and levels of abstinence varied considerably across indices. Incentive condition participants were also significantly more likely than non-incentivized Control participants to accept Wisconsin Tobacco Quit Line treatment calls and their acceptance of calls mediated their attainment of higher abstinence rates at 6-month follow-up. The cost/quit/participant averaged $4,268.26 for the Control participants and $3,601.37 for the Incentive participants.

Conclusions: This study shows that fairly moderate levels of incentive payments for treatment engagement and abstinence (a total possible payment of $190) increased very low-income smokers' engagement and success in smoking cessation treatment.

Clinical registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02713594.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of financial conflicts of interest: No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
STQ Quitline (QL) CONSORT Diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mediation Model of Incentive Effects on Abstinence by Quitline Call Acceptance
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hiscock R, Judge K, Bauld L. Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation? J Public Health (Oxf) 2011;33(1):39–47. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq09. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kotz D, West R. Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it’s not in the trying, but in the succeeding. Tob Control. 2009;18(1):43–46. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.025981. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy DT, Romano E, Mumford E. The relationship of smoking cessation to sociodemographic characteristics, smoking intensity, and tobacco control policies. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7(3):387–396. doi: 10.1080/14622200500125443. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neumann T, Rasmussen M, Ghith N, Heitmann BL, Tonnesen H. The Gold Standard Programme: smoking cessation interventions for disadvantaged smokers are effective in a real-life setting. Tob Control. 2013;22(6):e9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050194. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bock BC, Papandonatos GD, de Dios MA, et al. Tobacco cessation among low-income smokers: motivational enhancement and nicotine patch treatment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(4):413–422. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data