Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Nov;148(11):797-813.e52.
doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.08.045.

Adjuncts for the evaluation of potentially malignant disorders in the oral cavity: Diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis-a report of the American Dental Association

Mark W Lingen, Malavika P Tampi, Olivia Urquhart, Elliot Abt, Nishant Agrawal, Anil K Chaturvedi, Ezra Cohen, Gypsyamber D'Souza, JoAnn Gurenlian, John R Kalmar, Alexander R Kerr, Paul M Lambert, Lauren L Patton, Thomas P Sollecito, Edmond Truelove, Laura Banfield, Alonso Carrasco-Labra
Meta-Analysis

Adjuncts for the evaluation of potentially malignant disorders in the oral cavity: Diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis-a report of the American Dental Association

Mark W Lingen et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common manifestation of malignancy in the oral cavity. Adjuncts are available for clinicians to evaluate lesions that seem potentially malignant. In this systematic review, the authors summarized the available evidence on patient-important outcomes, diagnostic test accuracy (DTA), and patients' values and preferences (PVPs) when using adjuncts for the evaluation of clinically evident lesions in the oral cavity.

Types of studies reviewed: The authors searched for preexisting systematic reviews and assessed their quality using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews tool. The authors updated the selected reviews and searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials and DTA and PVPs studies. Pairs of reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and assessment of the certainty in the evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Results: The authors identified 4 existing reviews. DTA reviews included 37 studies. The authors retrieved 7,534 records, of which 9 DTA and 10 PVPs studies were eligible. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of adjuncts ranged from 0.39 to 0.96 for the evaluation of innocuous lesions and from 0.31 to 0.95 for the evaluation of suspicious lesions. Cytologic testing used in suspicious lesions appears to have the highest accuracy among adjuncts (sensitivity, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.98; specificity, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 0.99; low-quality evidence).

Conclusions and practical implications: Cytologic testing appears to be the most accurate adjunct among those included in this review. The main concerns are the high rate of false-positive results and serious issues of risk of bias and indirectness of the evidence. Clinicians should remain skeptical about the potential benefit of any adjunct in clinical practice.

Keywords: Oral squamous cell carcinoma; diagnostic test accuracy; patients’ values and preferences; potentially malignant disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart of the screening and study selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30. - PubMed
    1. Howlander N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al., eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2015. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/ Accessed March 15, 2017.
    1. Bouquot JE. Common oral lesions found during a mass screening examination. JADA. 1986;112(1):50–57. - PubMed
    1. Macey R, Walsh T, Brocklehurst P, et al. Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5: CD 010276. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh T, Liu JL, Brocklehurst P, et al. Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11: CD 010173. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types