Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 May;22(4):1651-1662.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2226-8. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

Clinical long-term success of contemporary nano-filled resin composites in class I and II restorations cured by LED or halogen light

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Clinical long-term success of contemporary nano-filled resin composites in class I and II restorations cured by LED or halogen light

Torsten Pflaum et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 May.

Abstract

Objectives: The use of LED light-curing units (LED LCUs) for polymerising resin-based composite restorations has become widespread throughout dentistry. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of clinical longitudinal studies that evaluate the comparative efficacy of LED-based polymerisation in direct posterior composite restorations. The aim of the present study was to investigate the performance of class I and II resin composite restorations for two successful composite restorative materials cured with LED versus halogen LCUs.

Methods: One hundred restorations were placed using the nano-filled composites Grandio® or Filtek™ Supremé. The following test groups were established: LED-Grandio® n = 23 (LG), LED-Filtek™ Supremé n = 21 (LS). As controls were used: Halogen-Grandio® n = 28 (HG), Halogen-Filtek™ Supremé n = 28 (HS). All restorations were evaluated according to the clinical criteria of the CPM index (C-criteria) at baseline and after 6, 12 and 36 months.

Results: After 12 and 36 months, there were no significant differences between restorations polymerised with LED or halogen light. At the end of the study, 97% of the restorations showed sufficient results regardless of the employed LCU or composite. Globally, after 36 months, 56% of all restorations were assessed with code 0 (excellent) and 41% with code 1 (acceptable). In detail, excellent results (code 0) among the criteria surface quality; marginal integrity and marginal discoloration were assigned in 72, 70 and 69%.

Conclusions: For the current limitations in the clinical trial design, the results showed that LED-polymerisation is appropriate to ensure clinical success of direct posterior resin composite restorations in a range of 3 years.

Clinical significance: The choice of LCU has no significant influence on the clinical performance of posterior direct resin composite restorations within 3 years of wear.

Keywords: Clinical evaluation; Composite; Filtek Supremé; Grandio; Halogen; LED; Posterior resin restorations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oper Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):356-61 - PubMed
    1. Dent Mater. 2013 Jun;29(6):605-17 - PubMed
    1. Dent Mater. 2010 May;26(5):416-25 - PubMed
    1. Gen Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;54(1):17-20 - PubMed
    1. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Jun;12(3):231-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources