Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;21(3):515-525.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002798. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

The Eating Motivation Survey: results from the USA, India and Germany

Affiliations

The Eating Motivation Survey: results from the USA, India and Germany

Gudrun Sproesser et al. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Research has shown that there is a large variety of different motives underlying why people eat what they eat, which can be assessed with The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS). The present study investigates the consistency and measurement invariance of the fifteen basic motives included in TEMS in countries with greatly differing eating environments.

Design: The fifteen-factor structure of TEMS (brief version: forty-six items) was tested in confirmatory factor analyses.

Setting: An online survey was conducted.

Subjects: US-American, Indian and German adults (total N 749) took part.

Results: Despite the complexity of the model, fit indices indicated a reasonable model fit (for the total sample: χ 2/df=4·03; standardized root-mean-squared residual (SRMR)=0·063; root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0·064 (95 % CI 0·062, 0·066)). Only the comparative fit index (CFI) was below the recommended threshold (for the total sample: CFI=0·84). Altogether, 181 out of 184 item loadings were above the recommended threshold of 0·30. Furthermore, the factorial structure of TEMS was invariant across countries with respect to factor configuration and factor loadings (configural v. metric invariance model: ΔCFI=0·009; ΔRMSEA=0·001; ΔSRMR=0·001). Moreover, forty-three out of forty-six items showed invariant intercepts across countries.

Conclusions: The fifteen-factor structure of TEMS was, in general, confirmed across countries despite marked differences in eating environments. Moreover, latent means of fourteen out of fifteen motive factors can be compared across countries in future studies. This is a first step towards determining generalizability of the fifteen basic eating motives of TEMS across eating environments.

Keywords: Consistent structure; Cross-country replication; Food choice motives; The Eating Motivation Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eertmans A, Victoir A, Vansant G et al. (2005) Food-related personality traits, food choice motives and food intake: mediator and moderator relationships. Food Qual Prefer 16, 714–726.
    1. Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E et al. (1998) Why Americans eat what they do. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 1118–1126. - PubMed
    1. Pollard TM, Steptoe A & Wardle J (1998) Motives underlying healthy eating: using the Food Choice Questionnaire to explain variation in dietary intake. J Biosoc Sci 30, 165–179. - PubMed
    1. Sproesser G, Strohbach S, Schupp HT et al. (2011) Candy or apple? How self-control resources and motives impact dietary healthiness in women. Appetite 56, 784–787. - PubMed
    1. Steptoe A & Wardle J (1999) Motivational factors as mediators of socioeconomic variations in dietary intake patterns. Psychol Health 14, 391–402.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources