Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 16:11:1767-1777.
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S143611. eCollection 2017.

Treatment decision-making among breast cancer patients in Malaysia

Yong Hui Nies  1 , Farida Islahudin  1 , Wei Wen Chong  1 , Norlia Abdullah  2 , Fuad Ismail  3 , Ros Suzanna Ahmad Bustamam  4 , Yoke Fui Wong  5 , J J Saladina  2 , Noraida Mohamed Shah  1
Affiliations

Treatment decision-making among breast cancer patients in Malaysia

Yong Hui Nies et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated breast cancer patients' involvement level in the treatment decision-making process and the concordance between patients' and physician's perspectives in decision-making.

Participants and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving physicians and newly diagnosed breast cancer patients from three public/teaching hospitals in Malaysia. The Control Preference Scale (CPS) was administered to patients and physicians, and the Krantz Health Opinion Survey (KHOS) was completed by the patients alone. Binary logistic regression was used to determine the association between sociodemographic characteristics, the patients' involvement in treatment decision-making, and patients' preference for behavioral involvement and information related to their disease.

Results: The majority of patients preferred to share decision-making with their physicians (47.5%), while the second largest group preferred being passive (42.6%) and a small number preferred being active (9.8%). However, the physicians perceived that the majority of patients preferred active decision-making (56.9%), followed by those who desired shared decision-making (32.8%), and those who preferred passive decision-making (10.3%). The overall concordance was 26.5% (54 of 204 patient-physician dyads). The median of preference for information score and behavioral involvement score was 4 (interquartile range [IQR] =3-5) and 2 (IQR =2-3), respectively. In univariate analysis, the ethnicity and educational qualification of patients were significantly associated with the patients' preferred role in the process of treatment decision-making and the patients' preference for information seeking (p>0.05). However, only educational qualification (p=0.004) was significantly associated with patients' preference for information seeking in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: Physicians failed to understand patients' perspectives and preferences in treatment decision-making. The concordance between physicians' perception and patients' perception was quite low as the physicians perceived that more than half of the patients were active in treatment decision-making. In actuality, more than half of patients perceived that they shared decision-making with their physicians.

Keywords: Control Preference Scale; Krantz Health Opinion Survey; Malaysia; breast cancer; patient–physician dyad; shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Beshir SA, Hanipah MA. Knowledge, perception, practice and barriers of breast cancer health promotion activities among community pharmacists in two Districts of Selangor state, Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(9):4427–4430. - PubMed
    1. Pathy NB, Yip CH, Taib NA, et al. Breast cancer in a multi-ethnic Asian setting: results from the Singapore–Malaysia hospital-based breast cancer registry. Breast. 2011;20:S75–S80. - PubMed
    1. Weng B, Wang Q, San Lin YL. Nasal cavity metastasis of breast cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(10):7028. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient–doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation – a critical analysis of models. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(1):116–124. - PubMed
    1. Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(4):289–310. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources