Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017:2017:4879836.
doi: 10.1155/2017/4879836. Epub 2017 Sep 10.

The Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Proximal Humeral Fractures

Affiliations
Review

The Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Proximal Humeral Fractures

Yongyu Ye et al. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017.

Abstract

Proximal humeral fractures are common and most challenging, due to the complexity of the glenohumeral joint, especially in the geriatric population with impacted fractures, that the development of implants continues because currently the problems with their fixation are not solved. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative assessments are crucial in management of those patients. Finite element analysis, as one of the valuable tools, has been implemented as an effective and noninvasive method to analyze proximal humeral fractures, providing solid evidence for management of troublesome patients. However, no review article about the applications and effects of finite element analysis in assessing proximal humeral fractures has been reported yet. This review article summarized the applications, contribution, and clinical significance of finite element analysis in assessing proximal humeral fractures. Furthermore, the limitations of finite element analysis, the difficulties of more realistic simulation, and the validation and also the creation of validated FE models were discussed. We concluded that although some advancements in proximal humeral fractures researches have been made by using finite element analysis, utility of this powerful tool for routine clinical management and adequate simulation requires more state-of-the-art studies to provide evidence and bases.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Launonen A. P., Lepola V., Saranko A., Flinkkilä T., Laitinen M., Mattila V. M. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Archives of osteoporosis. 2015;10:p. 209. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0209-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lauritzen J. B., Schwarz P., Lund B., McNair P., Transbøl I. Changing incidence and residual lifetime risk of common osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporosis International. 1993;3(3):127–132. doi: 10.1007/BF01623273. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seeley D. G., Browner W. S., Nevitt M. C., Genant H. K., Scott J. C., Cummings S. R. Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? Annals of Internal Medicine. 1991;115(11):837–842. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-11-837. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baron J., Barrett J., Karagas M. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone. 1996;18(3):S209–S213. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00504-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lind T., Kroner K., Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 1989;108(5):285–287. doi: 10.1007/BF00932316. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources