Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 29:11:262-272.
doi: 10.2174/1874364101711010262. eCollection 2017.

Conventional Versus Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A Comparison of Visual, Refractive, Topographic and Biomechanical Outcomes

Affiliations

Conventional Versus Accelerated Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: A Comparison of Visual, Refractive, Topographic and Biomechanical Outcomes

Jyh Haur Woo et al. Open Ophthalmol J. .

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to compare the visual, refractive, topographic and biomechanical outcomes in patients with progressive keratoconus treated with either conventional or accelerated crosslinking at one year follow up.

Methods: It is a prospective, non-randomised interventional study of 76 patients who underwent conventional (CXL; 3mW/cm2 for 30 minutes) or accelerated cross linking (KXL; 30mW/cm2 for 4 minutes) for progressive keratoconus. Baseline and postoperative visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal topography, pachymetry, endothelial cell density and biomechanical parameters of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were evaluated and compared.

Results: The 2 groups were comparable in terms of uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent. Both groups showed no significant increase in K1, K2 and Kmean from baseline at 12 months. There was also no difference between the CXL and KXL group for postoperative corneal topography as well as central and minimal pachymetry up to 12 months. There was a significant increase in both corneal hysteresis (0.62mm Hg, P=0.04) and corneal resistance factor (0.91mm Hg, P=0.003) in the KXL group at 12 months but not in the CXL group. There was no significant endothelial cell loss throughout follow up in both the groups.

Conclusion: We have established comparability of the 2 protocols in stabilizing the progression of keratoconus. Our findings also suggested an added biomechanical advantage of accelerated crosslinking at 1 year follow up.

Keywords: Biomechanical outcomes; Collagen; Corneal biomechanics; Cross linking; Keratoconus; Topographic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Figure showing K1, K2 and Kmean with time in the CXL group.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
Figure showing K1, K2 and Kmean with time in the KXL group.
Fig. (3)
Fig. (3)
Comparison of corneal hysteresis with time between the CXL and KXL group.
Fig. (4)
Fig. (4)
Comparison of corneal resistance factor with time between the CXL and KXL group.

References

    1. Konstantopoulos A., Mehta J.S. Conventional versus accelerated collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2015;41(2):65–71. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000093. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mastropasqua L. Collagen cross-linking: When and how? A review of the state of the art of the technique and new perspectives. Eye Vis (Lond) 2015:2: 19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGhee C.N., Kim B.Z., Wilson P.J. Contemporary treatment paradigms in keratoconus. Cornea. 2015;34(Suppl 10):S16–S23. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wollensak G., Spoerl E., Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):620–627. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)02220-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sorkin N., Varssano D. Corneal collagen crosslinking: A systematic review. Ophthalmologica. 2014;232(1):10–27. doi: 10.1159/000357979. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources