Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 11;3(1):e000285.
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2017-000285. eCollection 2017.

Feasibility of a real-time self-monitoring device for sitting less and moving more: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations

Feasibility of a real-time self-monitoring device for sitting less and moving more: a randomised controlled trial

Anne Martin et al. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: Time spent inactive and sedentary are both associated with poor health. Self-monitoring of walking, using pedometers for real-time feedback, is effective at increasing physical activity. This study evaluated the feasibility of a new pocket-worn sedentary time and physical activity real-time self-monitoring device (SitFIT).

Methods: Forty sedentary men were equally randomised into two intervention groups. For 4 weeks, one group received a SitFIT providing feedback on steps and time spent sedentary (lying/sitting); the other group received a SitFIT providing feedback on steps and time spent upright (standing/stepping). Change in sedentary time, standing time, stepping time and step count was assessed using activPAL monitors at baseline, 4-week follow-up (T1) and 12-week (T2) follow-up. Semistructured interviews were conducted after 4 and 12 weeks.

Results: The SitFIT was reported as acceptable and usable and seen as a motivating tool to reduce sedentary time by both groups. On average, participants reduced their sedentary time by 7.8 minutes/day (95% CI -55.4 to 39.7) (T1) and by 8.2 minutes/day (95% CI -60.1 to 44.3) (T2). They increased standing time by 23.2 minutes/day (95% CI 4.0 to 42.5) (T1) and 16.2 minutes/day (95% CI -13.9 to 46.2) (T2). Stepping time was increased by 8.5 minutes/day (95% CI 0.9 to 16.0) (T1) and 9.0 minutes/day (95% CI 0.5 to 17.5) (T2). There were no between-group differences at either follow-up time points.

Conclusion: The SitFIT was perceived as a useful tool for self-monitoring of sedentary time. It has potential as a real-time self-monitoring device to reduce sedentary and increase upright time.

Keywords: SitFIT; device; feasibility; sedentary behaviour; self-monitoring; sitting; user trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The SitFIT device was developed by PAL Technologies, which is a member of the EuroFIT consortium. DJM is CEO of PAL Technologies. All other authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention and data collection timeline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CONSORT flow diagram of recruitment and follow-up. CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. SBRN. Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012;37:540. - PubMed
    1. Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, et al. . Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:123–32. 10.7326/M14-1651 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chau JY, Grunseit AC, Chey T, et al. . Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013;8:e80000 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Proper KI, Singh AS, van Mechelen W, et al. . Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:174–82. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, et al. . Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. The Lancet 2016;388:1302–10. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30370-1 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources