Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 4):S484-S487.
doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.06.12.

Clinical usefulness of sperm DNA fragmentation testing

Affiliations
Comment

Clinical usefulness of sperm DNA fragmentation testing

Alex C Varghese et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Sep.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Evgeni E, Lymberopoulos G, Touloupidis S, et al. Sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation and its association with semen quality in Greek men. Andrologia 2015;47:1166-74. 10.1111/and.12398 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, McLachlan RI. Biological and clinical significance of DNA damage in the male germ line. Int J Androl 2009;32:46-56. 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00943.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. On the possible origins of DNA damage in human spermatozoa. Mol Hum Reprod 2010;16:3-13. 10.1093/molehr/gap059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zini A, Sigman M. Are tests of sperm DNA damage clinically useful? Pros and cons. J Androl 2009;30:219-29. 10.2164/jandrol.108.006908 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC, et al. Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios. Transl Androl Urol 2016;5:935-50. 10.21037/tau.2016.10.03 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources