Evidence based sperm DNA fragmentation

Joao Sabino Cunha-Filho^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
² Human Reproduction Centre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Comment

Joao Sabino Cunha-Filho. Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Sep.

. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 4):S527-S528.

doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.39.

Joao Sabino Cunha-Filho^{1

2}

¹ Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
² Human Reproduction Centre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

No abstract available

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Drawbacks of the current practice.
Agarwal A, Cho CL, Majzoub A, Esteves SC. Agarwal A, et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Sep;6(Suppl 4):S529-S531. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.24. Transl Androl Urol. 2017. PMID: 29082967 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios.
Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC, Ko E, Ramasamy R, Zini A. Agarwal A, et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Dec;5(6):935-950. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.10.03. Transl Androl Urol. 2016. PMID: 28078226 Free PMC article. Review.

1. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, et al. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015;13:37. 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, et al. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17-8. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-F - DOI - PubMed
1. Bhattacharya S, Hamilton MP, Shaaban M, et al. Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;357:2075-9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05179-5 - DOI - PubMed
1. Cunha-Filho JS. Evidence-based follitropin. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;13:155-6. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60608-6 - DOI - PubMed
1. Esteves SC. Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. Int Braz J Urol 2014;40:443-53. 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.02 - DOI - PubMed