Disparities in Zika Virus Testing and Incidence Among Women of Reproductive Age-New York City, 2016
- PMID: 29084118
- DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000684
Disparities in Zika Virus Testing and Incidence Among Women of Reproductive Age-New York City, 2016
Abstract
Context: The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH) performs surveillance for reportable diseases, including Zika virus (ZIKV) infection and disease, to inform public health responses. Incidence rates of other mosquito-borne diseases related to international travel are associated with census tract poverty level in NYC, suggesting that high poverty areas might be at higher risk for ZIKV infections.
Objectives: We assessed ZIKV testing rates and incidence of travel-associated infection among reproductive age women in NYC to identify areas with high incidence and low testing rates and assess the effectiveness of public health interventions.
Design: We analyzed geocoded ZIKV surveillance data collected by NYC DOHMH. Women aged 15 to 44 years tested during January-July 2016 (n = 4733) were assigned to census tracts, which we grouped by poverty level and quartile of the number of persons born in countries or territories with mosquito-borne ZIKV transmission as a proxy for risk of travel to these areas. We calculated crude ZIKV testing rates, incidence rates, and incidence rate ratios (IRRs).
Setting: New York City.
Results: Eight percent of patients (n = 376) tested had evidence of ZIKV infection. Cumulative incidence was higher both in areas with higher versus lower poverty levels (IRR = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.0) and in areas with the largest versus smallest populations of persons born in countries or territories with mosquito-borne ZIKV transmission (IRR = 11.3; 95% CI, 6.2-20.7). Initially, ZIKV testing rates were lowest in higher poverty areas with the largest populations of persons born in countries or territories with mosquito-borne ZIKV transmission (15/100 000), but following targeted interventions, testing rates were highest in these areas (80/100 000).
Conclusions: Geocoded data enabled us to identify communities with low testing but high ZIKV incidence rates, intervene to promote testing and reduce barriers to testing, and measure changes in testing rates.
Similar articles
-
Epidemiological Characteristics and Laboratory Findings of Zika Virus Cases in New York City, January 1, 2016-June 30, 2017.Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018 Jul;18(7):382-389. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2017.2223. Epub 2018 May 9. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018. PMID: 29742003
-
Disparities in Reportable Communicable Disease Incidence by Census Tract-Level Poverty, New York City, 2006-2013.Am J Public Health. 2015 Sep;105(9):e27-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302741. Epub 2015 Jul 16. Am J Public Health. 2015. PMID: 26180961 Free PMC article.
-
Using a call center to coordinate Zika virus testing-New York City, 2016.J Emerg Manag. 2016 Nov/Dec;14(6):391-395. doi: 10.5055/jem.2016.0303. J Emerg Manag. 2016. PMID: 28101877
-
Zika Virus and the Blood Supply: What Do We Know?Transfus Med Rev. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 9. Transfus Med Rev. 2017. PMID: 27569055 Review.
-
Zika virus epidemic: an update.Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2016 Dec;14(12):1127-1138. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1245614. Epub 2016 Oct 21. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2016. PMID: 27712118 Review.
Cited by
-
Identifying Areas at Greatest Risk for Recent Zika Virus Importation - New York City, 2016.PLoS Curr. 2018 Jul 25;10:ecurrents.outbreaks.00dd49d24b62731f87f12b0e657aa04c. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.00dd49d24b62731f87f12b0e657aa04c. PLoS Curr. 2018. PMID: 30254787 Free PMC article.
-
The Spectrum of Developmental Disability with Zika Exposure: What Is Known, What Is Unknown, and Implications for Clinicians.J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019 Jun;40(5):387-395. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000665. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30921103 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Public Health Systems View of Risk Communication About Zika.Public Health Rep. 2020 May/Jun;135(3):343-353. doi: 10.1177/0033354920912215. Epub 2020 Apr 3. Public Health Rep. 2020. PMID: 32243762 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of asymptomatic Zika virus infection: a systematic review.Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jun 1;96(6):402-413D. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.201541. Epub 2018 Apr 27. Bull World Health Organ. 2018. PMID: 29904223 Free PMC article.
-
Infectious disease, public health, and politics: United States response to Ebola and Zika.J Public Health Policy. 2020 Dec;41(4):399-409. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00243-0. J Public Health Policy. 2020. PMID: 32747704 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical