Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Oct 30;12(10):e0187015.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187015. eCollection 2017.

The effect of a novel extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption device on IL-6 elimination in septic patients: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of a novel extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption device on IL-6 elimination in septic patients: A randomized controlled trial

Dirk Schädler et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: We report on the effect of hemoadsorption therapy to reduce cytokines in septic patients with respiratory failure.

Methods: This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial. Mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome were eligible for study inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either therapy with CytoSorb hemoperfusion for 6 hours per day for up to 7 consecutive days (treatment), or no hemoperfusion (control). Primary outcome was change in normalized IL-6-serum concentrations during study day 1 and 7.

Results: 97 of the 100 randomized patients were analyzed. We were not able to detect differences in systemic plasma IL-6 levels between the two groups (n = 75; p = 0.15). Significant IL-6 elimination, averaging between 5 and 18% per blood pass throughout the entire treatment period was recorded. In the unadjusted analysis, 60-day-mortality was significantly higher in the treatment group (44.7%) compared to the control group (26.0%; p = 0.039). The proportion of patients receiving renal replacement therapy at the time of enrollment was higher in the treatment group (31.9%) when compared to the control group (16.3%). After adjustment for patient morbidity and baseline imbalances, no association of hemoperfusion with mortality was found (p = 0.19).

Conclusions: In this patient population with predominantly septic shock and multiple organ failure, hemoadsorption removed IL-6 but this did not lead to lower plasma IL-6-levels. We did not detect statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes multiple organ dysfunction score, ventilation time and time course of oxygenation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: MKK received a research grant for study administration and coordination by Cytosorbents. GM has received honorary from Cytosorbents. DS and MKK received refunds of travelling expenses by Cytosorbents. The remaining authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The study was supported by Cytosorbents Corporation, New Jersey, United States and investigated a product marketed by Cytosorbents. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Cytosorbents does not employ and does not pay consultancies to any of the authors.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart of patients.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Interleukin-6 elimination (calculated as difference of arterial and venous Interleukin 6 values) in the treatment group studied during a specific kinetic day where Interleukin-6 measurements were performed before the start of the study intervention (T0), 15 minutes (T15), 60 minutes (T60), 180 minutes (T180) and 360 minutes (T360) after the start of the hemoperfusion.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Median and interquartile range for Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plasma levels in the treatment and in the control group (n = 75).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Time course for log-transformed oxygenation index (Panel A), the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen and inspired fraction of oxygen (P/F ratio) (Panel B) and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) (Panel C) in the control group (grey boxes) and in the treatment group (white boxes).
The number of patients available are displayed in the header of each panel.
Fig 5
Fig 5. CD4-cell-activation for control (grey boxes) and treatment group (white boxes) on different study days.
Values > 1000 are evaluated as 1000, values <1 as 1. The number of patients available are displayed in the header of each panel.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Median and interquartile ranges of platelets (Panel A), white blood cells (WBC) (Panel B), albumin (Panel C), total protein (Panel D) and body temperature (Panel E) of treatment and control group for study day 1 to 7 before and after the treatment if applicable.

Comment in

References

    1. Bone RC, Fisher CJ Jr., Clemmer TP, Slotman GJ, Metz CA, Balk RA. Sepsis syndrome: a valid clinical entity. Crit Care Med. 1989;17(5):389–93. . - PubMed
    1. Gentile LF, Cuenca AG, Efron PA, Ang D, Bihorac A, McKinley BA, et al. Persistent inflammation and immunosuppression: a common syndrome and new horizon for surgical intensive care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1491–501. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kellum JA, Kong L, Fink MP, Weissfeld LA, Yealy DM, Pinsky MR, et al. Understanding the inflammatory cytokine response in pneumonia and sepsis: results of the Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(15):1655–63. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.15.1655 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Vriese AS, Colardyn FA, Philippe JJ, Vanholder RC, De Sutter JH, Lameire NH. Cytokine removal during continuous hemofiltration in septic patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10(4):846–53. . - PubMed
    1. Payen D, Mateo J, Cavaillon JM, Fraisse F, Floriot C, Vicaut E, et al. Impact of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on organ failure during the early phase of severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(3):803–10. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181962316 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types