Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 30;12(10):e0187296.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187296. eCollection 2017.

Efficacy and safety of dapsone as second line therapy for adult immune thrombocytopenia: A retrospective study of 42 patients

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of dapsone as second line therapy for adult immune thrombocytopenia: A retrospective study of 42 patients

Clémentine Estève et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Dapsone is recommended as a second line therapy in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but is underused because of its potential side effects. The medical charts of 42 ITP patients treated with dapsone (100 mg/day) were retrospectively reviewed in order to assess its efficacy and safety in daily clinical practice. The overall response rate was 54.8% (n = 22, with a complete response in 38.1%) with a median time to response of 29 days (24-41 days). Patients with complete response had shorter disease duration whereas no difference was observed between responders and non-responders regarding age, sex or previous treatments received. Importantly, after dapsone withdrawal, a sustained response was observed in 5 patients, representing 12% of the whole cohort. Twenty percent of patients (n = 8) relapsed on therapy after 8.1 (6.5-13.6) months. Side effects occurred in 31% (n = 13) of patients, and required dapsone withdrawal in 22% (n = 9) or dosage reduction in 10% (n = 4) of the cases. Side effects resolved in all but one case. Overall, these data support dapsone as an interesting second line therapy in ITP, with a good safety and efficacy profile at a low cost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart of the study.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Platelet count before and after 4 weeks dapsone was started, in responders (n = 23) and non-responder patients (n = 19).
P-value derived by Wilcoxon matched pairs test.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Flowchart of dapsone-treated patients.
Follow-up is given by median (1st-3rd interquartile).

References

    1. Neunert C, Lim W, Crowther M, Cohen A, Solberg L Jr, Crowther MA (2011) The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood 117: 4190–4207. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-302984 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Provan D, Stasi R, Newland AC, Blanchette VS, Bolton-Maggs P, Bussel JB et al. (2010) International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood 115: 168–186. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-225565 - DOI - PubMed
    1. British Committee for Standards in Haematology General Haematology Task Force (2003) Guidelines for the investigation and management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults, children and in pregnancy. Br J Haematol 120: 574–596. - PubMed
    1. Arnold DM, Dentali F, Crowther MA, Meyer RM, Cook RJ, Sigouin C et al. (2007) Systematic review: efficacy and safety of rituximab for adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Ann Intern Med 146: 25–33. - PubMed
    1. Godeau B, Porcher R, Fain O, Lefrere F, Fenaux P, Cheze S et al. (2008) Rituximab efficacy and safety in adult splenectomy candidates with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura—results of a prospective multicenter phase 2 study. Blood 112: 999–1004. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-131029 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources