Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 30;12(10):e0187240.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187240. eCollection 2017.

Recent development of risk-prediction models for incident hypertension: An updated systematic review

Affiliations

Recent development of risk-prediction models for incident hypertension: An updated systematic review

Dongdong Sun et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a leading global health threat and a major cardiovascular disease. Since clinical interventions are effective in delaying the disease progression from prehypertension to hypertension, diagnostic prediction models to identify patient populations at high risk for hypertension are imperative.

Methods: Both PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible reports of either prediction models or risk scores of hypertension. The study data were collected, including risk factors, statistic methods, characteristics of study design and participants, performance measurement, etc.

Results: From the searched literature, 26 studies reporting 48 prediction models were selected. Among them, 20 reports studied the established models using traditional risk factors, such as body mass index (BMI), age, smoking, blood pressure (BP) level, parental history of hypertension, and biochemical factors, whereas 6 reports used genetic risk score (GRS) as the prediction factor. AUC ranged from 0.64 to 0.97, and C-statistic ranged from 60% to 90%.

Conclusions: The traditional models are still the predominant risk prediction models for hypertension, but recently, more models have begun to incorporate genetic factors as part of their model predictors. However, these genetic predictors need to be well selected. The current reported models have acceptable to good discrimination and calibration ability, but whether the models can be applied in clinical practice still needs more validation and adjustment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The process of article search and selection.
From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Iterns for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/joumal.pmed1000097. For more information, visit www.prisma-statement.org.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Forest plots of pooling 35 models.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Funnel plot of publication bias.

References

    1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005; 365: 217–223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17741-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mendis S P P N B. editors (2011) Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. Geneva: World Health Organization, Geneva. 2011.
    1. Levy D, Ehret GB, Rice K, Verwoert GC, Launer LJ, Dehghan A, et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Genet. 2009; 41: 677–687. doi: 10.1038/ng.384 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Padmanabhan S. Prospects for genetic risk prediction in hypertension. Hypertension. 2013; 61: 961–963. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.00948 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Batty GD, Kivimaki M, Kengne AP. Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e67370 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067370 - DOI - PMC - PubMed