Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Nov 1;28(22):2941-2944.
doi: 10.1091/mbc.E17-08-0534.

Five years post-DORA: promoting best practices for research assessment

Affiliations
Editorial

Five years post-DORA: promoting best practices for research assessment

Sandra L Schmid. Mol Biol Cell. .

Abstract

The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was penned 5 years ago to articulate best practices for how we communicate and judge our scientific contributions. In particular, it adamantly declared that Journal Impact Factor (JIF) should never be used as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research contributions, or for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Since then, a heightened awareness of the damaging practice of using JIFs as a proxy for the quality of individual papers, and to assess an individual's or institution's accomplishments has led to changes in policy and the design and application of best practices to more accurately assess the quality and impact of our research. Herein I summarize the considerable progress made and remaining challenges that must be met to ensure a fair and meritocratic approach to research assessment and the advancement of research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 1:
JIFs are not a statistically relevant representation of the citation rates of individual papers. The total numbers of citations of papers published in 2014 in Journal of Cell Biology (n = 225), Developmental Cell (n = 211), and PLoS Biology (n = 186) are exponentially distributed (data obtained from Web of Science). Applying the appropriate Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) statistical tests yields an average p value >0.1. Thus the citation rates of individual papers in these journals are not significantly different.

References

    1. Alberts B. Impact factor distortions. Science. 2013;340:787. - PubMed
    1. DORA. Declaration on Research Assessment. 2012. Retrieved from www.ascb.org/dora/
    1. Eisen JA, Maccallum CJ, Neylon C. Expert failure: re-evaluating research assessment. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001677. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franzoni C, Scellato G, Stephan P. Science policy. Changing incentives to publish. Science. 2011;333:702–703. - PubMed
    1. Hutchins BI, Yuan X, Anderson JM, Santangelo GM. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): a new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002541. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources