Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 7;23(37):6868-6876.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6868.

Hospital readmissions in decompensated cirrhotics: Factors pointing toward a prevention strategy

Affiliations

Hospital readmissions in decompensated cirrhotics: Factors pointing toward a prevention strategy

Siamak M Seraj et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To reduce readmissions and improve patient outcomes in cirrhotic patients through better understanding of readmission predictors.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of patients admitted with decompensated cirrhosis from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 (n = 222). Primary outcomes were time to first readmission and 30-d readmission rate due to complications of cirrhosis. Clinical and demographic data were collected to help describe predictors of readmission, along with care coordination measures such as post-discharge status and outpatient follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to describe variables associated with readmission.

Results: One hundred thirty-two patients (59.4%) were readmitted at least once during the study period. Median time to first and second readmissions were 54 and 93 d, respectively. Thirty and 90-d readmission rates were 20.7 and 30.1 percent, respectively. Predictors of 30-d readmission included education level, hepatic encephalopathy at index, ALT more than upper normal limit and Medicare coverage. There were no statistically significant differences in readmission rates when stratified by discharge disposition, outpatient follow-up provider or time to first outpatient visit.

Conclusion: Readmissions are challenging aspect of care for cirrhotic patients and risk continues beyond 30 d. More initiatives are needed to develop enhanced, longitudinal post-discharge systems.

Keywords: Chronic care; Chronic disease; Cirrhosis; Liver disease; Re-hospitalizations; Readmissions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the Authors have no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meier curve for time to readmission stratified by MELD score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curve for time to readmission stratified by etiology of cirrhosis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) In: Kirch W (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Public Health. Netherlands: Springer. 2008:105.
    1. Kim WR, Brown RS Jr, Terrault NA, El-Serag H. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2002;36:227–242. - PubMed
    1. Asrani SK, Larson JJ, Yawn B, Therneau TM, Kim WR. Underestimation of liver-related mortality in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:375–382.e1-2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Volk ML, Tocco RS, Bazick J, Rakoski MO, Lok AS. Hospital readmissions among patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:247–252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agrawal K, Kumar P, Markert R, Agrawal S. Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmissions of Individuals with Decompensated Cirrhosis. South Med J. 2015;108:682–687. - PubMed

MeSH terms