Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jul;19(6):893-904.
doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0936-0. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy

Hanna van Waart  1 , Johanna M van Dongen  2 , Wim H van Harten  1   3 , Martijn M Stuiver  4   5 , Rosalie Huijsmans  6 , Jeannette A J H Hellendoorn-van Vreeswijk  7 , Gabe S Sonke  8 , Neil K Aaronson  9
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy

Hanna van Waart et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: A home-based, low-intensity physical activity program (Onco-Move) and a supervised, moderate-to-high intensity, combined resistance and aerobic exercise program (OnTrack) have proven to be effective in maintaining physical fitness and reducing fatigue among breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. This study evaluated the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of Onco-Move and OnTrack.

Methods: A total of 230 patients were randomized to Onco-Move, OnTrack, or usual care (UC). Health outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), general and physical fatigue, and physical fitness measured at baseline, end of chemotherapy, and 6-month follow-up. Societal costs included professional and informal health care, work absenteeism, and unpaid productivity costs. Cost data were based on 3-monthly questionnaires, supplemented by medication data obtained from pharmacies.

Results: Onco-Move is not likely to be cost-effective due to the relatively high willingness-to-pay necessary to reach reasonable probabilities of cost-effectiveness (QALY, general and physical fatigue). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for OnTrack compared to UC were €26,916/QALY, €788/1-point decrease in general fatigue and €1402/1-point decrease in physical fatigue. The probability of OnTrack being cost-effective ranged from 31% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €0-79% at a WTP of €80,000/QALY, 97% at a WTP of €15,000/1-point decrease in general fatigue, and 86% at a WTP of €24,000/1-point decrease in physical fatigue. Both interventions had a low probability of being cost-effective for physical fitness. The probability of cost-effectiveness for both interventions was greater among compliant participants.

Conclusions: Onco-Move is not likely to be cost-effective. Depending on the decision-makers' willingness-to-pay, OnTrack could be considered cost-effective in comparison with UC. Trial registration Clinical trial registration number of the Netherlands Trial Register-NTR2159.

Keywords: Exercise; Health economics; Physical activity; Physical therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):432-44 - PubMed
    1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Nov;94(2):123-33 - PubMed
    1. J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):171-89 - PubMed
    1. J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Mar;9(1):126-35 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(2):185-92 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources