Exploring the efficiency of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: a review
- PMID: 29089748
- PMCID: PMC5656351
- DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S130686
Exploring the efficiency of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: a review
Abstract
Due to rapidly aging human populations, frailty has become an essential concept, as it identifies older people who have higher risk of adverse outcomes, such as disability, institutionalization, lower quality of life, and premature death. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) is a user-friendly questionnaire based on a multidimensional approach to frailty, assessing physical, psychologic, and social aspects of human functioning. This review aims to explore the efficiency of the TFI in assessing frailty as a means to carry out research into the antecedents and consequences of frailty, and its use both in daily practice and for future intervention studies. Using a multidimensional approach to frailty, in contexts where health care professionals or researchers may have no time to interview or examine the client, we recommend employing the TFI because there is robust evidence of its reliability and validity and it is easy and quick to administer. More studies are needed to establish whether the TFI is suitable for intervention studies not only in the community, but also for specific groups such as patients in the hospital or admitted to an emergency department. We conclude that it is important to not only determine the deficits that frail older people may have, but also to assess their balancing strengths and resources. In order to be able to meet the individual needs of frail older persons, traditional and often fragmented elderly care should be developed toward a more proactive elderly care, in which frail older persons and their informal network are in charge.
Keywords: Tilburg Frailty Indicator; elderly care; frailty; measurement instruments; psychometric properties.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Wijnen-Sponselee MT, Schols JM. The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(5):344–355. - PubMed
-
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division . World Population Prospects. The 2015 Revision. Key findings and Advance Tables. New York: 2015. [Accessed August 8, 2015]. (Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241). Available from: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/files/key_findings_wpp_2015.pdf.
-
- van Bilsen PM, Hamers JP, Groot W, Spreeuwenberg C. Sheltered housing compared to independent housing in the community. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008;22(2):265–274. - PubMed
-
- WHO Centre for Health Development . A glossary of terms for community health care and services for older persons. Kobe, Japan: World Health Organization; 2004.
-
- Gilleard C, Hyde M, Higgs P. The impact of age, place, aging in place on the well-being of the over 50s in England. Res Aging. 2007;29(6):590–605.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
