Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 24:17:95.
doi: 10.1186/s12935-017-0466-y. eCollection 2017.

miR-1296-5p decreases ERBB2 expression to inhibit the cell proliferation in ERBB2-positive breast cancer

Affiliations

miR-1296-5p decreases ERBB2 expression to inhibit the cell proliferation in ERBB2-positive breast cancer

Gang Chen et al. Cancer Cell Int. .

Abstract

Background: The tumor suppressive role of miR-1296 is observed in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the effect of miR-1296-5p in ERBB2-positive breast cancers remains obscure.

Methods: Whether ERBB2 was the target gene of the miR-1296-5p was predicted by online software, and determined by dual-luciferase activity assay. miR-1296-5p expression levels were determined in breast cancer samples (114 breast cancer tissues and 30 adjacent normal tissues) by using qRT-PCR. The effect of miR-1296-5p and inhibition of ERBB2/mTORC1 signaling on the downstream target was assessed by Western blot. SK-BR-3 and BT-474 breast cancer cell line was transfected with miR-1296-5p mimic after which cell proliferation and apoptosis were determined by the clonogenic assay and the flow cytometry system, respectively. In addition, the chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity of SK-BR-3 and BT-474 cells transfected with miR-1296-5p mimic were determined by MTT assay.

Results: The luciferase assay carrying ERBB2 3'-untranslated region-based reporters expressed in SK-BR-3 and BT-474 cells suggested that ERBB2 was the target gene of miR-1296-5p. MiR-1296-5p was significantly decreased in breast cancer tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Moreover, it was declined in ERBB2-positive breast cancer samples compared with that in ERBB2-negative breast cancer tissues. Overexpressed miR-1296-5p reduced its target protein level and mTORC1/S6 activation, inhibited the proliferation of ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells and sensitized these cells to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-induced apoptosis.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that miR-1296-5p is involved in the regulation of proliferation in breast cancer cells via targeting ERBB2/mTORC1 signaling pathway.

Keywords: Breast cancer; ERBB2; Proliferation; mTORC1; miR-1296-5p.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ERBB2 as target of miR-1296-5p. a The seed sequence of miR-1296-5p is complementary to the 3′-UTR of ERBB2. b, c Luciferase assay showing reduction in reporter activity (relative luciferase units) after co-transfection of ERBB2-3′UTR with miR-1296-5p in SK-BR-3 or BT-474 cells. d, e Western blot analysis showing suppression of ERBB2 protein levels in SK-BR-3 or BT-474 cells after miR-1296-5p overexpression
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MiR-1296-5p is down-regulated in breast cancer tissues. The miR-1296-5p expression is suppressed in a majority of breast cancer samples (n = 114) when compared to normal breast samples (n = 30). The miRNA relative expression levels were normalized to the average value of breast cancer samples
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MiR-1296-5p is down-regulated in ERBB2-positive breast cancer tissues. The miR-1296-5p expression is suppressed in a majority of ERBB2-positive breast cancer samples (n = 40) when compared to ERBB2-negative breast cancer samples (n = 74). The miRNA relative expression levels were normalized to the average value of ERBB2-positive breast cancer samples
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
MiR-1296-5p suppresses mTORC1 signaling. a, b miR-1296-5p overexpression did not alter the activation of RhoA and Rac1 in SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells. The RhoA or Rac1 relative active levels were normalized to the average value of SK-BR-3 cells transfected with control miRNA. ns, no significance. c, d miR-1296-5p overexpression suppresses the phosphorylation of S6 in SK-BR-3 or BT-474 breast cancer cells
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
MiR-1296-5p suppresses the colony formation ability of ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells. a, c miR-1296-5p overexpression reduced the colony formation ability of SK-BR-3 or BT-474 breast cancer cells when compared to control miRNA-expressing cells. b miR-1296-5p overexpression did not alter the apoptosis of SK-BR-3 breast cancer cells when compared to control miRNA-expressing cells. ns no significance
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
MiR-1296-5p sensitizes cells to chemotherapy drugs. a, b Overexpression of miR-1296 in SK-BR-3 or BT-474 breast cancer cells significantly sensitized cells to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment as compared to control miRNA. Cells were treated with cisplatin 24 h following miR-1296-5p transfection and the cell viability was assessed after 48 h of cisplatin treatment. 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil. HCPT, hydroxy camptothecin. ns no significance

References

    1. Fabi A, Mottolese M, Segatto O. Therapeutic targeting of ERBB2 in breast cancer: understanding resistance in the laboratory and combating it in the clinic. J Mol Med (Berl) 2014;92(7):681–695. doi: 10.1007/s00109-014-1169-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, Holt JA, Wong SG, Keith DE, Levin WJ, Stuart SG, Udove J, Ullrich A, et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989;244(4905):707–712. doi: 10.1126/science.2470152. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen H, Sun JG, Cao XW, Ma XG, Xu JP, Luo FK, Chen ZT. Preliminary validation of ERBB2 expression regulated by miR-548d-3p and miR-559. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;385(4):596–600. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.05.113. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu D, Hung MC. Overexpression of ErbB2 in cancer and ErbB2-targeting strategies. Oncogene. 2000;19(53):6115–6121. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203972. - DOI - PubMed