Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct 17:8:540.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00540. eCollection 2017.

The Neurological Wake-up Test-A Role in Neurocritical Care Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients?

Affiliations
Review

The Neurological Wake-up Test-A Role in Neurocritical Care Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients?

Niklas Marklund. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

The most fundamental clinical monitoring tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is the repeated clinical examination. In the severe TBI patient treated by continuous sedation in a neurocritical care (NCC) unit, sedation interruption is required to enable a clinical evaluation (named the neurological wake-up test; NWT) assessing the level of consciousness, pupillary diameter and reactivity to light, and presence of focal neurological deficits. There is a basic conflict regarding the NWT in the NCC setting; can the clinical information obtained by the NWT justify the risk of inducing a stress response in a severe TBI patient? Furthermore, in the presence of advanced multimodal monitoring and neuroimaging, is the NWT necessary to identify important clinical alterations? In studies of severe TBI patients, the NWT was consistently shown to induce a stress reaction including brief increases in intracranial pressure (ICP) and changes in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). However, it has not been established whether these short-lived ICP and CPP changes are detrimental to the injured brain. Daily interruption of sedation is associated with a reduced ventilator time, shorter hospital stay and reduced mortality in many studies of general intensive care unit patients, although such clinical benefits have not been firmly established in TBI. To date, there is no consensus on the use of the NWT among NCC units and systematic studies are scarce. Thus, additional studies evaluating the role of the NWT in clinical decision-making are needed. Multimodal NCC monitoring may be an adjunct in assessing in which TBI patients the NWT can be safely performed. At present, the NWT remains the golden standard for clinical monitoring and detection of neurological changes in NCC and could be considered in TBI patients with stable baseline ICP and CPP readings. The focus of the present review is an overview of the existing literature on the role of the NWT as a clinical monitoring tool for severe TBI patients.

Keywords: monitoring; neurocritial care; stress response; traumatic brain injury; wake-up test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration on how to evaluate the pain response, an integral component of the NWT of unconscious patients unable to obey commands. Apply a steady pressure at the medial aspect of the periorbital rim, at the supraorbital notch (A), or preferably at the angle of the jaw (B). After the pain response has been noted, a peripheral pain stimulus is provided by compressing the fingertips with a pencil (C) and, e.g., a localization, withdrawal, flexion, or extension response can be recorded (52). Based on the response of the patient, the motor component of the Glasgow Coma Scale can then be evaluated. The pupillary response to light and the presence of anisocoria as well as any focal neurological deficits are also noted.

References

    1. Morris GF, Juul N, Marshall SB, Benedict B, Marshall LF. Neurological deterioration as a potential alternative endpoint in human clinical trials of experimental pharmacological agents for treatment of severe traumatic brain injuries. Executive Committee of the International Selfotel Trial. Neurosurgery (1998) 43:1369–72. 10.1227/00006123-199812000-00063 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Juul N, Morris GF, Marshall SB, Marshall LF. Intracranial hypertension and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence on neurological deterioration and outcome in severe head injury. The Executive Committee of the International Selfotel Trial. J Neurosurg (2000) 92:1–6. 10.3171/jns.2000.92.1.0001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reilly PL, Graham DI, Adams JH, Jennett B. Patients with head injury who talk and die. Lancet (1975) 2(7931):375–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92893-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet (1974) 2(7872):81–4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91639-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stein SC, Georgoff P, Meghan S, Mizra K, Sonnad SS. 150 years of treating severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of progress in mortality. J Neurotrauma (2010) 27:1343–53. 10.1089/neu.2009.1206 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources