Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct 10:2:1-9.
doi: 10.15256/joc.2012.2.15. eCollection 2012.

A scoping review and thematic classification of patient complexity: offering a unifying framework

Alexis K Schaink  1 , Kerry Kuluski, Renée F Lyons, Martin Fortin  2 , Alejandro R Jadad  3 , Ross Upshur  4 , Walter P Wodchis  5
Affiliations

A scoping review and thematic classification of patient complexity: offering a unifying framework

Alexis K Schaink et al. J Comorb. .

Abstract

The path to improving healthcare quality for individuals with complex health conditions is complicated by a lack of common understanding of complexity. Modern medicine, together with social and environmental factors, has extended life, leading to a growing population of patients with chronic conditions. In many cases, there are social and psychological factors that impact treatment, health outcomes, and quality of life. This is the face of complexity. Care challenges, burden, and cost have positioned complexity as an important health issue. Complex chronic conditions are now being discussed by clinicians, researchers, and policy-makers around such issues as quantification, payment schemes, transitions, management models, clinical practice, and improved patient experience. We conducted a scoping review of the literature for definitions and descriptions of complexity. We provide an overview of complex chronic conditions, and what is known about complexity, and describe variations in how it is understood. We developed a Complexity Framework from these findings to guide our approach to understanding patient complexity. It is critical to use common vernacular and conceptualization of complexity to improve service and outcomes for patients with complex chronic conditions. Many questions still persist about how to develop this work with a health and social care lens; our framework offers a foundation to structure thinking about complex patients. Further insight into patient complexity can inform treatment models and goals of care, and identify required services and barriers to the management of complexity. Journal of Comorbidity 2012;2:1-9.

Keywords: biopsychosocial model; chronic conditions; complexity; holistic health; multimorbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Complexity Framework showing five health dimensions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mirolla M. The cost of chronic disease in Canada: Executive summary. Ottawa, ON: The Chronic Disease Prevention Alliance of Canada; 2004.
    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Bishop M, Peugh J, Murukutla N. Toward higher-performance health systems: adults’ health care experiences in seven countries, 2007. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26(6):w717–34. - PubMed
    1. Smith SM, O’Dowd T. Chronic diseases: what happens when they come in multiples? Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(537):268–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ontario Health Quality Council. OHQC 2008 Report on Ontario’s Health System. In: Q Monitor Report. 2008. pp. 1–111. Available from: http://www.hqontario.ca/pdfs/ohqc_2008_report_-_english.pdf [last accessed Sept 19, 2012]
    1. World Health Organization. Preventing chronic diseases: a vital investment : WHO Global Report. World Health Organization; 2005. Available from: http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/full_report.pdf [last accessed Sept 19, 2012]

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources