Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 1;25(5):568-571.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx125.

Using machine learning for sequence-level automated MRI protocol selection in neuroradiology

Affiliations

Using machine learning for sequence-level automated MRI protocol selection in neuroradiology

Andrew D Brown et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Incorrect imaging protocol selection can lead to important clinical findings being missed, contributing to both wasted health care resources and patient harm. We present a machine learning method for analyzing the unstructured text of clinical indications and patient demographics from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) orders to automatically protocol MRI procedures at the sequence level. We compared 3 machine learning models - support vector machine, gradient boosting machine, and random forest - to a baseline model that predicted the most common protocol for all observations in our test set. The gradient boosting machine model significantly outperformed the baseline and demonstrated the best performance of the 3 models in terms of accuracy (95%), precision (86%), recall (80%), and Hamming loss (0.0487). This demonstrates the feasibility of automating sequence selection by applying machine learning to MRI orders. Automated sequence selection has important safety, quality, and financial implications and may facilitate improvements in the quality and safety of medical imaging service delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Process of medical imaging exam protocoling.

References

    1. Boland GW, Duszak R, Kalra M. Protocol design and optimization. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11:440–41. - PubMed
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H et al. , Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;29310:1223–38. - PubMed
    1. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC et al. , Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;61:92. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R et al. , Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;1571:29–43. - PubMed
    1. Nuckols TK, Smith-Spangler C, Morton SC et al. , The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014;31:56. - PMC - PubMed